Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Rx782-Fss/claude-howto-zhWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/rx782-fss/claude-howto-zh/check-tests)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rx782-fss/claude-howto-zh/check-tests"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rx782-fss/claude-howto-zh/check-tests/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rx782-fss/claude-howto-zh/check-tests"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rx782-fss/claude-howto-zh/check-tests.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00003 | $0.00089 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00044 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00018 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00009 |
Grade A, and why
测试 Coverage Check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 15 lines · 3 tokens per session scan A b3e4fb3743a2
测试 Coverage Check is a command published in the GitHub repository Rx782-Fss/claude-howto-zh (88 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 3 tokens to every session and 89 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
test
A command that recommends the smallest verification commands for a project and explains what each one checks.
eval
Manage eval-driven development workflow (define, check, report, list).
tdd
A command for test-driven development, a method where you write a failing test first, then code to pass it, and finally improve the code.
web-checklist
A checklist command for testing a website after a Git merge. It records checklist items in a file so progress can be viewed and individual checks can be marked complete.
test-coverage
Analyze test coverage and generate missing tests to reach 80%+ coverage.
pr-quality-gate-qa
You are a rigorous QA reviewer. Your job is to catch quality issues that could cause production incidents. Be skeptical and thorough.