Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/saajunaid/caddis-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/saajunaid/caddis-plugin/create-readme)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/saajunaid/caddis-plugin/create-readme"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/saajunaid/caddis-plugin/create-readme/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/saajunaid/caddis-plugin/create-readme"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/saajunaid/caddis-plugin/create-readme.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00762 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00305 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00152 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
create-readme scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 125 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/create-readme - Generate Project README
You must review the project and create a README.md immediately.
Input
User's request: {{input}}
If {{input}} is empty, scan the workspace to infer project details automatically.
Step 1: Review the Project
Before writing, understand the project thoroughly:
- Read key files:
package.json,pyproject.toml,requirements.txt,Cargo.toml, etc. - Scan project structure: Understand the directory layout
- Identify the stack: Languages, frameworks, databases, services
- Find existing branding: Logos, icons, or banner images in the repo
Step 2: Write the README
Role
You are a senior open-source engineer who writes READMEs that are appealing, informative, and easy to scan.
Content Rules
- Use GFM (GitHub Flavored Markdown) including admonitions where appropriate:
> [!NOTE] > Useful information the reader should know. > [!WARNING] > Critical information for avoiding issues. README.mdis a descriptive Markdown doc. Prepend the metadata frontmatter required by.github/instructions/document-frontmatter.instructions.mdbefore the title. New READMEs requireOriginal Author,Creation Date, andCreating Model; later edits must preserve those fields and add or updateLast Author,Last Updated, andLast Model Used.- If a logo or icon exists in the repo, use it in the header
- Do not overuse emojis -- keep it professional
- Keep the README concise and scannable
- Do not include full LICENSE, CONTRIBUTING, or CHANGELOG sections (those belong in dedicated files). A one-line reference is fine.
Required Sections
Include these sections (skip any that don't apply):
---
Original Author: {active author or agent name}
Creation Date: {YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SSZ}
Creating Model: {exact runtime model identifier or display name}
---
# {Project Name}
{One-line description}
{Badges: language, framework, license, build status}
## Features
- **Feature 1** - Brief description
- **Feature 2** - Brief description
## Prerequisites
- Runtime versions, tools, access requirements
## Getting Started
1. Clone / install steps
2. Configuration steps
3. Run command
## Usage
{Primary usage examples with code blocks}
## Project Structure
{Tree view of key directories}
## Configuration
| Variable | Description | Default |
|----------|-------------|---------|
| `VAR` | Purpose | value |
## Contributing
Brief reference to CONTRIBUTING.md or guidelines.
## License
One-line reference to LICENSE file.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 125 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A be3575fe1c3a
create-readme is a command published in the GitHub repository saajunaid/caddis-plugin (0 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 762 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-09.
Other commands, from other repositories
end-session
Wrap up the work session with read-only evidence gathering, owner-classified documentation handoffs, gated issue sync, Kano refinement, and git hygiene checks.
test-feature
Test a React Native feature on the running simulator/emulator. Verifies UI, user flows, and internal state. Generates a persistent Maestro test file.
accept
Command dispatcher for accept.
change
Command dispatcher for change.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.