Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/main/.claude/commands/improve-ats-score.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-appWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/improve-ats-score)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/improve-ats-score"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/improve-ats-score/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/improve-ats-score"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/improve-ats-score.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00213 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00085 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00043 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00021 |
Grade A, and why
improve-ats-score scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Improve the ATS score for: $ARGUMENTS
- Load
token-efficiency; readdocs/knowledge/resume-domain.md. - Spawn
job-match-expert(Agent) — compute the gap: missing keywords/skills/requirements vs the target job; produce actionable, truthful suggestions (never fabricate experience). - Spawn
resume-export-expert(Agent) — verify the proposed changes keep the document ATS-safe (parseable layout, section naming, no formatting that breaks extraction). - Present the prioritized changes + expected score impact. If the user approves edits to résumé data, apply them; if it's a change to the scoring/formatting code, route through
/implement-feature.
≤3 agents (the two Primaries + an optional Secondary). Stop at ~90% confidence.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed 2aafa6d11325
- 1mo ago First seen · 14 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A d714670b5f14
improve-ats-score is a command published in the GitHub repository saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app (62 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 213 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
quiz
Generate and play an interactive study quiz from a KMS knowledge base, URL, file, or topic — and record the score back into the KMS.
quiz-result
Analyze quiz progress over time and the weak areas to study next, from a KMS scores log.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.