Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/main/.claude/commands/refactor-module.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-appWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/refactor-module)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/refactor-module"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/refactor-module/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/refactor-module"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/refactor-module.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00257 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00103 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00051 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00026 |
Grade A, and why
refactor-module scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Refactor: $ARGUMENTS
- Load
review-workflow+token-efficiency+ the area's standards skill. - Map the module with graphify (MCP
query_graph "<module>"+shortest_pathfor dependents, elsegraphify explain "<module>"/graphify path). Stop at ~90% confidence. - Characterize behavior — ensure tests pin current behavior before refactoring (
test-authoradds characterization tests if missing). - Refactor on a feature branch — behavior-preserving; respect layer boundaries (
rust-standards) and feature isolation (frontend-standards). No functional changes mixed in. - Review — Primary Owner of the area (+ Secondary on risk, ≤3 reviewers); HIGH/CRITICAL block. Watch for hidden behavior changes.
- Verify the full test suite is green pre/post; docs/lessons via
project-steward(architecture decisions → propose an ADR). - Open a PR.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 15 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 525d49366a45
refactor-module is a command published in the GitHub repository saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app (62 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 257 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
rust-review
Lightweight Rust code review using clippy.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.