Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-appWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/review-agent-cli)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/review-agent-cli"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/review-agent-cli/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/review-agent-cli"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/review-agent-cli.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00377 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00151 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00075 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
review-agent-cli scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Run an agent CLI review (verb surface, argv parsing, allowlist projections incl. nested types, the machine-readable output contract, help/schema drift, throttle scope, destructive-command ergonomics).
- Load the
token-efficiency+agent-cli-standardsskills. - Scope with graphify/codegraph; stop at ~90% confidence. No repo-wide scan.
- Target =
$ARGUMENTSif given, else the currentgit diffunderapps/desktop/src-tauri/src/extension_bridge/agent_cli.rs,agent_read.rs, any CLI verb table they reach, and the CLI's slice of the shared protocol files —msg.rsframe constants, theagent.querydispatch arm inmod.rs, and the origin/gate inauth.rs. Those three are owned byextension-reviewer; review the CLI's part and name them in the report so that reviewer runs too. - Spawn only the
agent-cli-reviewersubagent (Agent) as Primary Owner. Addtauri-security-revieweras Secondary for any destructive verb, new data exposure, or auth change — ≤3 reviewers. - Report functional and stylistic findings in separate lists; only functional HIGH/CRITICAL block (irreversible action from a mis-parsed argument, PII a projection claims to exclude, unfenced untrusted text, a bypassed spend/rate limit, a hang, an output-contract break).
- If the diff changes runtime behaviour, require an end-to-end run against a live app — this surface's worst defects were invisible to reading.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed cbb7877dd916
- 1mo ago First seen · 14 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 66a9bd69b9e8
review-agent-cli is a command published in the GitHub repository saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app (62 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 377 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
codebase-review
Review an entire codebase for architecture, engineering health, and exploitable risk; generate a prioritized remediation plan, an evidence-anchored system knowledge document, or both.
devkit.react.code-review
Provides comprehensive React 19 + Tailwind CSS code review focusing on modern patterns, hooks, Server Components, Actions, performance, accessibility, and Tailwind best practices. Use when reviewing React code changes or before merging pull requests.
cargo-clippy
Command "cargo-clippy" from olorehq/olore, covering cargo-clippy(1), name, description and see also.
fe
Invoke Frontend Developer for React, TypeScript, Next.js, and React Native development.
pr-review
You are reviewing a PR in the Conduit monorepo.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.