Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-appWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/review-extension)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/review-extension"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/review-extension/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/review-extension"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/review-extension.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00271 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00135 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00054 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00027 |
Grade A, and why
review-extension scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Run an extension / bridge review (MV3 compliance, permission minimization, pairing/token auth, origin allowlist, protocol lockstep TS↔Rust, Chrome Web Store + Firefox AMO store policy).
- Load the
token-efficiency+extension-standardsskills (the latter carries the Chrome Web Store + AMO store-policy checklist). - Scope with graphify; stop at ~90% confidence. No repo-wide scan.
- Target =
$ARGUMENTSif given, else the currentgit diffunderapps/extension/,apps/desktop/src-tauri/src/extension_bridge/,commands/extension_bridge.rs,packages/shared/src/ipc/extension-protocol-constants.ts. - Spawn only the
extension-reviewersubagent (Task) as Primary Owner. Addtauri-security-reviewer(auth/token/permission/data) as Secondary on risk — ≤3 reviewers. - Report severity-tagged findings; HIGH/CRITICAL block (auth bypass, token leakage, over-broad permission / store-rejection risk, protocol drift).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 13 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 081534815364
review-extension is a command published in the GitHub repository saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app (55 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 271 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
analyze
Analyze a webpage's structure using Actionbook's verified selectors and show available elements for scraping.
devkit.react.code-review
Provides comprehensive React 19 + Tailwind CSS code review focusing on modern patterns, hooks, Server Components, Actions, performance, accessibility, and Tailwind best practices. Use when reviewing React code changes or before merging pull requests.
codebase-review
Review an entire codebase for architecture, engineering health, and exploitable risk; generate a prioritized remediation plan, an evidence-anchored system knowledge document, or both.
ia-test-browser
Run browser tests on pages affected by current PR or branch.
cargo-clippy
Command "cargo-clippy" from olorehq/olore, covering cargo-clippy(1), name, description and see also.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.