Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/main/.claude/commands/review-rust.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-appWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/review-rust)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/review-rust"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/review-rust/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/review-rust"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/review-rust.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00270 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00108 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00054 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00027 |
Grade A, and why
review-rust scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Run a focused Rust backend review.
- Load the
token-efficiency+rust-standardsskills. - Scope with graphify (MCP
query_graph "rust backend architecture", elsegraphify explain "rust backend architecture") — no repo-wide scan. - Target =
$ARGUMENTSif given, else the currentgit diff. - Read
docs/knowledge/architecture.md+docs/architecture-rules.mdbefore source; stop at ~90% confidence. - Spawn only the
rust-backend-architectsubagent (Agent) as Primary Owner over the target. Addtauri-security-reviewerand/orperformance-profileras Secondary only if the change is risk-bearing — ≤3 reviewers total. - If the change touches testable logic, route to
test-author→testing-reviewer(separate stage). - Report severity-tagged findings (
LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH/CRITICAL · file:line · fix); HIGH/CRITICAL block.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed 289ab1bd067c
- 1mo ago First seen · 15 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 18dcd446cc87
review-rust is a command published in the GitHub repository saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app (62 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 270 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
rust-critique
Deep code critique — read the target Rust code and apply the full review process. Evaluates soundness, ownership, error handling, type design, async correctness, performance, and architecture. Think like a senior Rust engineer giving honest feedback.
dotnet-structure
Analyze and recommend .NET backend solution and folder structure improvements. Checks projects, layers, oversized files, and boundary clarity.
docs
Fetch Rust API documentation from docs.rs.
index
Codegen-first polyglot web toolkit: one Rust core, 14 language bindings, spec-driven codegen (OpenAPI, AsyncAPI, GraphQL, gRPC, SQL to HTTP) and a 13-tool MCP server. Experimental, pre-1.0, MIT.
rust:audit-layer-boundaries
Analyze layer boundary definitions in Rust codebases, identifying mixed responsibilities and violations.
tokio-scaffold
Scaffold new Tokio projects with proper structure and best practices.