Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Sagargupta16/claude-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/sagargupta16/claude-skills/check-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sagargupta16/claude-skills/check-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sagargupta16/claude-skills/check-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sagargupta16/claude-skills/check-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sagargupta16/claude-skills/check-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00407 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00204 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00081 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00041 |
Grade A, and why
check-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Live state
- PR details: !
gh pr view $ARGUMENTS --json state,mergeable,mergeStateStatus,isDraft,reviewDecision,statusCheckRollup,title,url 2>/dev/null || gh pr view --json state,mergeable,mergeStateStatus,isDraft,reviewDecision,statusCheckRollup,title,url 2>/dev/null || echo "no PR found" - Review comments: !
gh pr view $ARGUMENTS --json comments,reviews 2>/dev/null || gh pr view --json comments,reviews 2>/dev/null || echo "" - CI checks: !
gh pr checks $ARGUMENTS 2>/dev/null || gh pr checks 2>/dev/null || echo ""
Task
Using the live state above, produce a merge-readiness report.
- State: open / closed / merged / draft.
- CI: all green, or list failing checks with names and conclusions.
- Reviews: approved / changes-requested / pending. Summarize any unaddressed review comments.
- Merge readiness:
mergeStateStatusinterpretation --CLEAN,BEHIND(needs rebase),BLOCKED(required checks),DIRTY(conflicts),UNSTABLE(non-required failures). - If CI is failing, fetch the failing run's log head and identify the root cause (test failure, lint, build error). Suggest a narrow fix.
Output
PR: <title> (#<num>)
State: <state>
CI: <all-green | N failing: ...>
Reviews: <status>
Merge: <ready | blocked: <reason>>
Action: <one line>
$ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago Changed d88e9e2523b5
- 10d ago First seen · 35 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 9421168be370
check-pr is a command published in the GitHub repository Sagargupta16/claude-skills (5 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 407 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
commit
Create a git commit with intelligent message drafting (-f for fast, -v for verbose).
review-arch
Review app architecture: components, data flows, risks, and prioritized improvements.
resolve-pr
Resolve PR review feedback — fetch unresolved threads, triage, dispatch resolver agents, reply + resolve via GraphQL.
pr
Prepare and open a pull request the senior way: gate, template, scrubbed, everything visible.
status
The state of play, computed fresh: branch, dirty files, the active sprint, open work, index freshness.
fix-comments
Address PR review comments by implementing requested changes automatically.