Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Sahib-Sawhney-WH/sahibs-claude-plugin-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/sahib-sawhney-wh/sahibs-claude-plugin-marketplace/workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sahib-sawhney-wh/sahibs-claude-plugin-marketplace/workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sahib-sawhney-wh/sahibs-claude-plugin-marketplace/workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sahib-sawhney-wh/sahibs-claude-plugin-marketplace/workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sahib-sawhney-wh/sahibs-claude-plugin-marketplace/workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.01200 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00480 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00240 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00120 |
Grade A, and why
workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 198 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
DAPR Workflow Scaffolding
Create a new DAPR workflow with all required components and best practices.
Behavior
When the user runs /dapr:workflow:
-
Gather Workflow Info
- Workflow name (from $ARGUMENTS or prompt)
- Workflow pattern (sequential, parallel, saga, approval)
- Number of activities
- Brief description of each step
-
Generate Workflow Code
# workflows/{workflow_name}.py from dapr.ext.workflow import ( WorkflowRuntime, DaprWorkflowContext, WorkflowActivityContext, RetryPolicy ) from datetime import timedelta wf_runtime = WorkflowRuntime() # Retry policy retry_policy = RetryPolicy( max_number_of_attempts=3, first_retry_interval=timedelta(seconds=1), backoff_coefficient=2.0 ) @wf_runtime.workflow(name="{workflow_name}") def {workflow_name}_workflow(ctx: DaprWorkflowContext, input: dict): # Generated workflow logic pass @wf_runtime.activity(name="{activity_name}") def {activity_name}(ctx: WorkflowActivityContext, data: dict): # Generated activity logic pass -
Generate Client Code
# clients/{workflow_name}_client.py from dapr.ext.workflow import DaprWorkflowClient async def start_{workflow_name}(input_data: dict): async with DaprWorkflowClient() as client: instance_id = await client.schedule_new_workflow( workflow="{workflow_name}", input=input_data ) return instance_id -
Generate Tests
# tests/test_{workflow_name}.py import pytest from workflows.{workflow_name} import * def test_{workflow_name}_activity(): # Test activity logic pass -
Update Dependencies
- Add
dapr-ext-workflowto requirements.txt if missing
- Add
Arguments
$ARGUMENTS- Workflow name and pattern:order-processing- Basic workflow nameorder-processing --pattern saga- With specific patternorder-processing --steps 5- Number of steps
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 198 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A e7e385ddf4a2
workflow is a command published in the GitHub repository Sahib-Sawhney-WH/sahibs-claude-plugin-marketplace (4 stars, last pushed 10mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 1,200 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
workflow compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| workflowSahib-Sawhney-WH/sahibs-claude-plugin-marketplace | Command | 4 | 10mo ago | MIT | A | 16 | Claude Code |
| initfcakyon/claude-codex-settings | Command | 1.2k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| http-serviceMadAppGang/magus | Command | 14 | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| buildAzure/ai-gateway | Command | 5 | 10d ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| api-contract-reviewMozurok/fhorja.dev | Command | 10 | 28d ago | MIT | A | 64 | Claude Code |
| start-10-1minicoohei/ai-agent-camp | Command | 347 | 1mo ago | none | A | 2 | Claude Code |
| fastapimfmezger/ai_agent_dotfiles | Command | 7 | 3mo ago | MIT | A | 84 | Claude Code, Gemini CLI |