Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/sairam0424/mindforge/brdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sairam0424/MindForgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/sairam0424/mindforge/brd)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sairam0424/mindforge/brd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sairam0424/mindforge/brd.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00855 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00428 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00171 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00085 |
Grade A, and why
brd scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
<execution_context> @.mindforge/skills/business-analyst/SKILL.md </execution_context>
-
Build power-interest grid: Plot stakeholders on a 2x2 matrix:
- High Power / High Interest → Manage closely (key players)
- High Power / Low Interest → Keep satisfied
- Low Power / High Interest → Keep informed
- Low Power / Low Interest → Monitor Derive engagement strategy per quadrant.
-
Elicit requirements: For each key stakeholder group, extract:
- Business objectives (what outcome do they need?)
- Functional requirements (what must the system do?)
- Non-functional requirements (performance, security, compliance, accessibility)
- Constraints (budget, timeline, technology, regulatory)
- Assumptions and dependencies
-
Draft BRD (10 sections):
-
- Executive Summary
-
- Business Objectives and Success Criteria
-
- Stakeholder Analysis (power-interest grid)
-
- Scope (in-scope, out-of-scope, future phases)
-
- Functional Requirements (numbered, prioritized)
-
- Non-Functional Requirements (measurable targets)
-
- Business Rules and Constraints
-
- AS-IS Process Model
-
- TO-BE Process Model
-
- Risk Register and Mitigation Plan
-
-
Map AS-IS state: Document the current process:
- Process flow (steps, actors, systems involved)
- Pain points and inefficiencies
- Current metrics and baselines
- Technology landscape in use today
- Compliance obligations already met
-
Map TO-BE state: Document the desired future process:
- Improved process flow
- Eliminated pain points
- Target metrics (with specific improvement percentages)
- New technology components
- New compliance requirements addressed
-
Gap analysis: For each AS-IS vs TO-BE delta:
- Gap description
- Impact if not addressed (quantified where possible)
- Effort estimate (T-shirt size: S/M/L/XL)
- Priority (Must/Should/Could/Won't — MoSCoW)
- Dependencies on other gaps
-
Define acceptance criteria: For each functional requirement, write testable acceptance criteria using Given-When-Then format. Ensure each criterion is:
- Specific (no ambiguity)
- Measurable (pass/fail deterministic)
- Traceable to a business objective
-
Validate with stakeholders: Present the BRD summary to stakeholders:
- Highlight key trade-offs and decisions needed
- Flag any conflicting requirements between stakeholder groups
- Propose resolution options for conflicts
- Request sign-off on scope and priorities
-
Output BRD: Write the final document to
.planning/BRD-[project-slug].mdwith:- Version number and date
- Approval signatures section
- Change log
- Traceability matrix (requirement → objective → stakeholder)
- Appendices (glossary, acronyms, reference documents)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 91 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A a14e6976cd04
brd is a command published in the GitHub repository sairam0424/MindForge (0 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 855 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
factory-report
Linear status report across configured repos — queue depth, triage backlog, ready-to-dispatch, blocked/held.
research-close
Close research - moves to done.
factory-ticket
Implement exactly one already-claimed Linear ticket in the current worktree.
factory-next
Recommend and optionally run the next factory stage for this repo.
ah
Show Aigon commands (shortcut for help).
decompose
Feature/story breakdown — consume a ready-for-decompose scope doc and produce a task graph in the issue tracker. Re-entrant; tracker-as-canonical with vault breadcrumb.