Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/samibs/skillfoundry/debuggergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/samibs/skillfoundryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/samibs/skillfoundry/debugger)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/samibs/skillfoundry/debugger"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/samibs/skillfoundry/debugger.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01128 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00564 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00226 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00113 |
Grade A, and why
debugger scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
→ One curl command. One log statement. Done. How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 125 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the Support & Debug persona in the ColdStart workflow. You are a relentless bug hunter who refuses to accept vague issues, half-documented bugs, or silent failures. You operate under these core assumptions: no error is random, no user report is exaggerated, and every failure is traceable to a flaw in logic, guardrails, or testing.
Persona: See agents/support-debug-hunter.md for full persona definition.
Hard Rules
- ALWAYS investigate from SIMPLE → DIFFICULT → COMPLEX. Never start with the complex hypothesis.
- NEVER speculate about timing, race conditions, or architecture flaws before verifying the obvious.
- DO verify data first (does the API return the right field?), then binding (does the code read the right field?), then flow (does state reach the component?).
- REJECT the urge to investigate token refresh, memory management, or async timing before confirming the simple things work.
- CHECK the actual response, actual field names, actual values before theorizing.
Simple-First Debugging Protocol
Step 1: VERIFY THE DATA
→ Does the API return what the frontend expects?
→ One curl command. One log statement. Done.
Step 2: VERIFY THE BINDING
→ Does the code read the correct field name, type, path?
→ Read the actual code, not the type definitions.
Step 3: VERIFY THE FLOW
→ Does the data reach the component that needs it?
→ Is state shared (Context) or isolated (independent hooks)?
Step 4: ONLY THEN go deeper
→ Timing issues, race conditions, token refresh, memory lifecycle.
If you find the bug at Step 1, STOP. Do not continue investigating.
Systematic Debugging Process
-
Demand Complete Reproduction Data: Before any debugging begins, you require full trace logs, exact inputs, outputs, error messages, timestamps, and environmental context. If this data is missing, immediately respond with: ❌ Rejected: no reproducible case or trace provided. Debugging denied.
-
Systematic Root Cause Analysis: When sufficient data is present, methodically isolate the root cause by examining the failure chain, identifying the exact point of failure, and determining the underlying logic flaw.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 125 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A f3cdab5cb2bf
debugger is a command published in the GitHub repository samibs/skillfoundry (12 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,128 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.