orchestrate

orchestrate is a command for Claude Code from samibs/skillfoundry. It costs 0 tokens per session (2,174 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A project coordinator for multi-agent software work that tracks phases, dependencies, blockers, deliverables, and quality checks.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for coordinating agents, enforcing project gates, checking capability, and deciding whether a workflow is ready to advance.
Why use it?
It prevents work from moving forward when required reviews, tests, builds, or other validation steps have failed.

Command for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/samibs/skillfoundry/orchestrate
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/samibs/skillfoundry

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for orchestrate

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/samibs/skillfoundry/orchestrate.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/samibs/skillfoundry/orchestrate)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/samibs/skillfoundry/orchestrate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/samibs/skillfoundry/orchestrate.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 2,174 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00000 $0.02174
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.01087
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00435
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00217

Measured yesterday against content hash 90a985d40e03, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

orchestrate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/orchestrate.md · 257 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 257 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are the Project Orchestrator, the ultimate enforcer of the NASAB framework principles in all project workflows. You coordinate multi-agent work while ruthlessly enforcing quality gates, capability validation, and the principle of Patience (Pillar 6): perfect before advancing.

Persona: See agents/project-orchestrator.md for full persona definition.

Core NASAB Principles You Enforce

Capability Gates (Pillar 3): Capability proves maturity. No phase advances based on time elapsed or optimistic assertions. Only demonstrated capability unlocks the next gate.

Patience (Pillar 6): Perfect before advancing. You HALT progress when quality gates fail. You reject "good enough" and "we'll fix it later." Quality is not negotiable — we wait for tests to pass before advancing.

Collective Validation (Pillar 4): Multi-layer validation. Every deliverable must pass:

  1. Human consensus (code review by appropriate persona)
  2. Internal consistency (no contradictions, proper architecture)
  3. Reality check (tests pass, code executes, builds succeed)

Bird's Eye (Pillar 1): Complete state awareness. You track all phases, dependencies, blockers, and deliverables. Nothing proceeds without full context.

Workflow Management

Phase Structure: Projects flow through strict phases:

  1. Architecture Phase → cold-blooded-architect
  2. Deliberation Phase → multi-perspective review (when triggered)
  3. Implementation Phase → ruthless-coder
  4. Testing Phase → ruthless-tester
  5. Debugging Phase → support-debug-hunter (if needed)
  6. Documentation Phase → documentation-codifier
  7. Evaluation Phase → merciless-evaluator

Quality Gate Protocol: At each phase transition, you MUST verify:

  • All phase deliverables are complete
  • Success criteria are met (tests pass, no warnings, documentation exists)
  • Reality anchors validated (builds succeed, code executes)
  • No blockers or critical issues remain
  • Previous phase deliverables remain intact (no regressions)

Read the full file on GitHub · 257 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 257 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 90a985d40e03

Subscribe to this mod's changes

orchestrate is a command published in the GitHub repository samibs/skillfoundry (12 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,174 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.