Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sangrokjung/claude-forgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/sangrokjung/claude-forge/security-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sangrokjung/claude-forge/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sangrokjung/claude-forge/security-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sangrokjung/claude-forge/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sangrokjung/claude-forge/security-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.05081 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.02540 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.01016 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00508 |
Grade B, and why
security-review scanned grade B with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Downloads and executes remote codemediumSupply chain
curl | sh runs whatever the server returns today, which is not necessarily what it returned when this was reviewed.
grep -rn 'eval(\|new Function(\|JSON\.parse' src/ | grep -v 'JSON\.parse(JSON' # CWE-918: SSRF grep -rn 'fetch(\|axios\.\(get\|post\)' src/ | grep 'req\.\|params\.\|query\.' Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
│ CWE-78 │ OS Command Injection │ exec(, spawn(, execSync( │ Crit │ How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 446 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Task
0단계: effort:max 강제
⚠️ Security Review는 항상 effort:max로 실행됩니다.
이는 보안 품질을 위해 타협할 수 없는 설정입니다.
모든 분석은 최대 깊이로 수행되며, 축약하지 않습니다.
effort:max를 내부적으로 강제 적용한다. 보안 검토는 속도보다 정확성이 우선이며, shallow scan은 허용하지 않는다.
1단계: 스캔 대상 식별
파라미터 파싱:
[경로]: 특정 파일 또는 디렉토리 지정--auto: git diff 기반 변경 파일만 스캔 (민감 패턴 감지 시 자동 트리거)--quick: 변경 파일 대상 빠른 스캔 (CWE 상위 10개만)--cwe: CWE Top 25 전체 매핑 상세 분석--stride: STRIDE 위협 모델링 추가 실행--deps: 의존성 취약점 검사--report [형식]: markdown 또는 json 리포트 파일 생성
스캔 범위 결정:
# --auto: git diff 변경 파일만
git diff --cached --name-only | grep -E '\.(ts|tsx|js|jsx|py|go|rs|java)$'
git diff --name-only | grep -E '\.(ts|tsx|js|jsx|py|go|rs|java)$'
# --quick: 변경 파일 빠른 스캔
git diff --name-only HEAD~1 | grep -E '\.(ts|tsx|js|jsx|py|go|rs|java)$'
# 기본 (플래그 없음): 전체 소스 파일
find src/ lib/ app/ -type f -name '*.ts' -o -name '*.tsx' -o -name '*.js' -o -name '*.jsx'
Auto-trigger 패턴 (--auto 모드에서 파일 경로/내용에 포함 시 자동 확대 스캔):
| 패턴 | 위험 수준 | 설명 |
|---|---|---|
auth |
Critical | 인증 관련 코드 |
payment |
Critical | 결제 처리 코드 |
session |
High | 세션 관리 |
token |
High | 토큰 발급/검증 |
password |
Critical | 비밀번호 처리 |
secret |
Critical | 시크릿/키 관리 |
crypto |
High | 암호화 로직 |
jwt |
High | JWT 토큰 처리 |
admin |
High | 관리자 기능 |
upload |
Medium | 파일 업로드 |
download |
Medium | 파일 다운로드 |
redirect |
Medium | URL 리다이렉트 |
2단계: CWE Top 25 매핑
모든 소스 파일에 대해 CWE Top 25 기반 패턴 매칭을 수행한다. 각 발견 항목에는 반드시 CWE ID를 태깅한다.
┌─────────┬──────────────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────┬──────┐
│ CWE ID │ Name │ Detection Pattern │ Sev │
├─────────┼──────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────┼──────┤
│ CWE-79 │ Cross-site Scripting (XSS) │ innerHTML, dangerouslySet*, │ Crit │
│ │ │ v-html, [innerHTML]= │ │
├─────────┼──────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────┼──────┤
│ CWE-89 │ SQL Injection │ query( + string concat/ │ Crit │
│ │ │ template literal with ${}, │ │
│ │ │ .raw( + user input │ │
├─────────┼──────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────┼──────┤
│ CWE-78 │ OS Command Injection │ exec(, spawn(, execSync( │ Crit │
│ │ │ + user-controlled input │ │
├─────────┼──────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────┼──────┤
│ CWE-22 │ Path Traversal │ ../ in user-supplied paths, │ High │
│ │ │ path.join( + req.params │ │
├─────────┼──────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────┼──────┤
│ CWE-352 │ Cross-Site Request Forgery │ POST/PUT/DELETE without │ High │
│ │ │ CSRF token validation │ │
├─────────┼──────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────┼──────┤
│ CWE-287 │ Improper Authentication │ Missing auth middleware, │ High │
│ │ │ auth check bypass │ │
├─────────┼──────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────┼──────┤
│ CWE-862 │ Missing Authorization │ Route handler without authz, │ High │
│ │ │ direct object reference │ │
├─────────┼──────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────┼──────┤
│ CWE-798 │ Hardcoded Credentials │ apiKey=", secret=", pass=", │ Crit │
│ │ │ token=", key=" (literals) │ │
├─────────┼──────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────┼──────┤
│ CWE-200 │ Exposure of Sensitive Info │ console.log + secret/token/ │ Med │
│ │ │ password, error stack trace │ │
│ │ │ in response │ │
├─────────┼──────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────┼──────┤
│ CWE-502 │ Deserialization of Untrusted │ JSON.parse(untrusted), │ High │
│ │ Data │ eval(, new Function( │ │
├─────────┼──────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────┼──────┤
│ CWE-306 │ Missing Authentication for │ Critical endpoint without │ High │
│ │ Critical Function │ auth guard │ │
├─────────┼──────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────┼──────┤
│ CWE-20 │ Improper Input Validation │ No schema validation (zod/ │ Med │
│ │ │ joi), missing sanitization │ │
├─────────┼──────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────┼──────┤
│ CWE-269 │ Improper Privilege Mgmt │ Role escalation, missing │ High │
│ │ │ role check │ │
├─────────┼──────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────┼──────┤
│ CWE-434 │ Unrestricted Upload │ File upload without type/ │ High │
│ │ │ size validation │ │
├─────────┼──────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────┼──────┤
│ CWE-918 │ Server-Side Request Forgery │ fetch/axios with user URL, │ High │
│ │ │ no URL allowlist │ │
├─────────┼──────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────┼──────┤
│ CWE-611 │ XML External Entity (XXE) │ XML parser without disabled │ High │
│ │ │ external entities │ │
├─────────┼──────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────┼──────┤
│ CWE-77 │ Command Injection │ Template strings in shell │ Crit │
│ │ │ commands │ │
├─────────┼──────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────┼──────┤
│ CWE-276 │ Incorrect Default Perms │ 0777, world-writable files, │ Med │
│ │ │ permissive CORS │ │
├─────────┼──────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────┼──────┤
│ CWE-732 │ Incorrect Permission Assign │ Public access to admin │ High │
│ │ │ resources │ │
├─────────┼──────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────┼──────┤
│ CWE-327 │ Use of Broken Crypto Algo │ md5(, sha1(, DES, RC4, │ Med │
│ │ │ Math.random() for security │ │
└─────────┴──────────────────────────────┴───────────────────────────────┴──────┘
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 446 lines · 23 tokens per session scan B afe87cdf5cf1
security-review is a command published in the GitHub repository sangrokjung/claude-forge (825 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 5,081 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 2 findings (downloads and executes remote code, runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
security-scan
Run security audit on codebase.
help
Explain Ralph Wiggum technique and available commands.
security
Rapid security assessment focused on OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities.
costs
Open ccboard costs analysis tab.
adopt-roadmap.template
This prompt was authored for Claude-style slash workflows. In Codex runtime, adapt tool calls as follows.
epic-advance.template
This prompt was authored for Claude-style slash workflows. In Codex runtime, adapt tool calls as follows.