Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/sareegpt/edgartools-mcp/checkpointgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sareegpt/edgartools-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/sareegpt/edgartools-mcp/checkpoint)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sareegpt/edgartools-mcp/checkpoint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sareegpt/edgartools-mcp/checkpoint.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00763 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00381 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00153 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
checkpoint scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to checkpoint — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 121 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Create Progress Checkpoint
You are creating a checkpoint of the current work session to enable a clean context restart.
Step 1: Determine Context
Ask yourself:
- What is the main task we're working on?
- What's a brief, descriptive name for this task? (e.g., "oauth-migration", "fix-bug-429", "add-13f-support")
Step 2: Create Checkpoint Document
Create a progress document with this structure:
Filename: docs-internal/sessions/session-{task-name}-{YYYY-MM-DD}.md
Use today's date and a brief task name (kebab-case, max 3-4 words).
Document Structure:
# Session Checkpoint: {Task Name}
**Date**: {YYYY-MM-DD}
**Time**: {HH:MM}
**Branch**: {current git branch}
## Task Summary
{1-2 sentence description of what we're working on}
## Completed ✅
- {Specific accomplishment with file path}
- {Another completed item}
## In Progress 🔄
- {Current work item}
- {Any blockers or issues encountered}
## Remaining Tasks ⬜
- [ ] {Next task to complete}
- [ ] {Another remaining task}
## Key Decisions 🎯
- **{Decision topic}**: {What was decided and why}
- **{Another decision}**: {Rationale}
## Important Files 📁
- `path/to/file.py` - {What this file does in this context}
- `path/to/another.py` - {Why this file matters}
## Next Steps 🚀
1. {Explicit next action}
2. {Second action}
3. {Third action}
## Context Notes
{Any important context that would be lost after /clear - patterns discovered,
gotchas encountered, areas of concern, etc.}
Step 3: Quality Check
Ensure the checkpoint includes:
- ✅ Specific file paths (not vague "updated files")
- ✅ Clear next steps (actionable, not vague)
- ✅ Technical decisions with rationale
- ✅ Any blockers or issues that need attention
- ✅ Brief enough to scan quickly (<150 lines ideal)
Step 4: Save and Instruct
After creating the document, tell the user:
✅ Checkpoint saved to: {filename}
To continue after clearing context:
1. Type: /clear
2. Type: @{filename} /catchup
3. Say: "Continue with {specific next step from Next Steps}"
Alternative quick restart:
- /catchup (will catch git changes including this checkpoint if committed)
Ready to clear when you are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 121 lines · 6 tokens per session scan A 2e88f48a33e7
checkpoint is a command published in the GitHub repository sareegpt/edgartools-mcp (5 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 6 tokens to every session and 763 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to checkpoint, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
minutes-ideas
Surface recent voice memos and ideas captured from any device. Use when the user asks "what ideas did I have?", "what were my recent memos?", "what did I record while walking?", or wants to recall a captured thought.
learn
Force claude-smart to extract learnings from this session now.
session-end
I'll summarize this coding session and update the memory system with our accomplishments.
memory-store
Store an insight, decision, or pattern to memory.
cc-memory
Configure persistent memory that survives across sessions using a layered approach: split rule files for always-loaded context, auto-memory for organic learning, and optional MCP-backed long-term memory for large codebases.
analyze-context
USE WHEN you want to analyze project context before starting work on a task. Calls context + recall, then synthesizes goals, decisions, gotchas, and relevant memories into a pre-task brief.