Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sarkarsaurabh27/agent-loop-learningWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/sarkarsaurabh27/agent-loop-learning/improve-agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sarkarsaurabh27/agent-loop-learning/improve-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sarkarsaurabh27/agent-loop-learning/improve-agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sarkarsaurabh27/agent-loop-learning/improve-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sarkarsaurabh27/agent-loop-learning/improve-agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00997 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00399 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00199 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00100 |
Grade A, and why
improve-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 71 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/improve-agent
Goal: execute on issues found. Apply concrete, benchmark-backed improvements to the agent in this repo.
There are two entry paths:
- Findings already exist (the user just ran
/review-agent, pasted a review, or named specific issues) → skip straight to executing on those. - No findings yet → first run the
/review-agentflow internally to surface gaps, then execute on the top issues.
Works for any LLM agent framework — LangChain, LangGraph, AutoGen, CrewAI, OpenAI Agents SDK, Semantic Kernel, custom loops, etc. Recommendations are framework-agnostic unless the user asks for framework-specific code.
Usage
/improve-agent → full system pass (review first if needed, then execute)
/improve-agent orchestration → focus on multi-agent design
/improve-agent prompting → focus on prompt structure
/improve-agent memory → focus on context & memory
/improve-agent tools → focus on tool design
/improve-agent verification → focus on testing & verification
/improve-agent security → focus on security & permissions
/improve-agent performance → focus on startup & latency
/improve-agent <paste findings> → execute on the pasted findings directly
Instructions
-
Check whether findings already exist in the conversation.
- If the user pasted a review, named specific issues, or just ran
/review-agent— use those findings as the work list and skip to step 4. - Otherwise, continue to step 2 to generate them.
- If the user pasted a review, named specific issues, or just ran
-
Explore the current repo first — do not ask the user for anything yet. Search for agent-related code:
- Files matching
*agent*,*tool*,*prompt*,*chain*,*workflow*insrc/,lib/,app/, root - Imports of agent frameworks:
langchain,langgraph,openai,anthropic,autogen,crewai - System prompt definitions, tool definitions, agent loop logic
CLAUDE.md,AGENTS.md, or any README describing the agent architecture
- Files matching
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 71 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 613e913747eb
improve-agent is a command published in the GitHub repository sarkarsaurabh27/agent-loop-learning (3 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 997 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
qa-changes
This skill should be used when the user asks to "QA a pull request", "test PR changes", "verify a PR works", "functionally test changes", or when an automated workflow triggers QA validation of code changes. Provides a structured methodology for setting up the environment, exercising changed behavior, and reporting…
react-native
Command "react-native" from getsentry/toolkit, covering examples, also associate with a release and distribution(s), xcode build step (react-native xcode) and important notes.
doctor
Diagnosticar y reparar problemas del framework Don Cheli, git y entorno. Usa cuando el usuario dice "doctor", "problemas del framework", "don cheli no funciona", "repair Don Cheli", "debug setup", "setup broken", "framework broken", "reparar entorno". Detecta y repara issues de configuración, git y dependencias…
doctor
Badi configuration validation. Checks all Badi components and produces a diagnostic report.
auditar-cascading
Invoca cascading-failures-auditor — audita serviço para 5 triggers de cascade (sem timeout, retry sem jitter, sem circuit breaker, sem deadline, queue unbounded) e gera CASCADING-AUDIT.md.
http-service
Build, review or debug a Bun HTTP service. Loads the http-service skill, then works the task through its workflow.