Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/saski/arnesto/fic-create-plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/saski/arnestoWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00971 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00485 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00194 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00097 |
Grade A, and why
fic-create-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 189 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
FIC Create Plan - Detailed Implementation Plans
Act as a Senior XP Developer creating detailed implementation plans through interactive, iterative collaboration.
Task
Input: $ARGUMENTS
If $ARGUMENTS contains a file path (e.g., thoughts/shared/research/...), read it first.
If $ARGUMENTS contains a task description, use it as context.
If empty, ask for the task description.
Planning Process
Step 1: Context Gathering
-
Read all mentioned files completely
- Research documents
- Ticket files
- Related code
-
Research the codebase
- Find relevant files and patterns
- Understand existing implementation
- Look for similar features to model after
-
Present understanding and ask questions
Based on my research, I understand we need to [summary]. I've found: - [Discovery with file:line reference] - [Pattern or constraint] Questions that need clarification: - [Specific question] - [Design choice question]
Step 2: Research & Discovery
-
Investigate the codebase for:
- Where changes need to happen
- Existing patterns to follow
- Integration points
- Test patterns
-
Present design options
Based on my research: **Current State:** - [Key discovery] - [Pattern to follow] **Design Options:** 1. [Option A] - pros/cons 2. [Option B] - pros/cons Which approach?
Step 3: Plan Structure
-
Create initial outline
Proposed plan structure: ## Overview [1-2 sentence summary] ## Phases: 1. [Phase name] - [what it accomplishes] 2. [Phase name] - [what it accomplishes] 3. [Phase name] - [what it accomplishes] Does this phasing make sense? -
Get feedback before writing details
Step 4: Write the Plan
Save to thoughts/shared/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-topic.md:
# [Feature] Implementation Plan
## Overview
[Brief description of what we're implementing]
## Current State Analysis
[What exists now, key constraints discovered]
## Desired End State
[Specification of the end goal and how to verify it]
## What We're NOT Doing
[Explicitly list out-of-scope items]
## Implementation Approach
[High-level strategy]
## Phase 1: [Name]
### Overview
[What this phase accomplishes]
### Changes Required:
#### 1. [Component/File]
**File**: `path/to/file.ext`
**Changes**: [Summary]
```language
// Specific code changes
Success Criteria:
- Tests pass:
make test - Linting passes:
make lint - Type checking passes
Phase 2: [Name]
[Similar structure...]
Testing Strategy
Unit Tests:
- [What to test]
- [Edge cases]
Integration Tests:
- [End-to-end scenarios]
References
- Research:
thoughts/shared/research/[file].md - Similar implementation:
[file:line]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 189 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 6599d2c1fef5
fic-create-plan is a command published in the GitHub repository saski/arnesto (5 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed Unlicense. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 971 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
ops-sweep
Sweep all repos/sessions via git deltas and refresh the Agentic Ops Ledger (low-token). Use at session end, or when asked to update the ledger, document progress, or recommend next prompts.
coder-eval-implement-plan
Implement an approved codereval plan phase by phase with risk-scaled per-phase review, then a final code review.
OPSX: Bulk Archive
Archive multiple completed changes at once.
research
Research a technical or product question.
auto-run
PitWay: Manage auto-run authorization for automatic task continuation.
task-integrate
PitWay: Apply a dispatched task's worktree commit to the main tree.