Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to satanyakiv/NutriSport. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/satanyakiv/NutriSport/main/.claude/commands/clean-arch.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/satanyakiv/NutriSportWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/satanyakiv/nutrisport/clean-arch)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/satanyakiv/nutrisport/clean-arch"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/satanyakiv/nutrisport/clean-arch/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/satanyakiv/nutrisport/clean-arch"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/satanyakiv/nutrisport/clean-arch.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00507 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00253 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00101 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
clean-arch scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Read .claude/rules/architecture.md, .claude/rules/models.md, .claude/rules/error-handling.md, .claude/rules/conventions.md
Clean Architecture Check
$ARGUMENTS
Violation Checklist
Scan the specified module/files for these violations:
Critical (must fix)
- DTO leak:
*Dtoimport outside:networkmodule - Firebase leak:
dev.gitlive.firebase.*import outside:network - Domain in UI: Domain model used directly in
@Composableparameters - Circular dep: Feature module depends on another feature module
- :domain impurity: Platform/network/Firebase code in
:domain
Warning (should fix)
- Missing mapper: Direct field access across layers instead of mapper
- Fat ViewModel: Business logic > 10 lines (extract UseCase)
- God class: File > 150 lines or function > 20 lines
- Wrong module: Repository impl not in
:network, ViewModel not in:feature - Missing suffix: Model outside domain without Dto/Ui suffix
- ViewModel in Screen: ViewModel injected inside Screen composable (should be in Route)
Process
-
SCAN — grep for violations using the checklist above. Report with file paths and line numbers. Wait for "go".
-
FIX — apply changes following architecture rules
-
VERIFY — run tests, compile check, confirm zero behavior change
Model Placement Reference
domain/.../domain/ → Product, Customer (no suffix)
network/.../dto/ → ProductDto (Dto suffix)
network/.../mapper/ → ProductMapper (toDomain/toDto)
feature/.../model/ → ProductUi (Ui suffix)
feature/.../mapper/ → ProductMappers (toUi)
Mapper Pattern
// data layer: DTO → Domain
fun ProductDto.toDomain() = Product(id = id, title = title, price = price)
// feature layer: Domain → UI
fun Product.toUi() = ProductUi(id = id, title = title, formattedPrice = "$${"%.2f".format(price)}")
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 54 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 1b291ae3683c
clean-arch is a command published in the GitHub repository satanyakiv/NutriSport (11 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 507 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
sdd-init
Initialize SDD context — detects project stack and bootstraps persistence backend.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.
argos
A command for checking whether an implementation matches its design deliverables. Its Korean description compares the work to the design as part of a completion inspection.