Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SatoruoGojoo/octopusWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/satoruogojoo/octopus/overview)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/satoruogojoo/octopus/overview"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/satoruogojoo/octopus/overview/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/satoruogojoo/octopus/overview"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/satoruogojoo/octopus/overview.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.00236 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00094 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00047 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
overview scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
用 Agent 工具啟動 scout，指明這是 /octopus:overview 專案鳥瞰（它的行為規格在自己的「專案鳥瞰」段）。
轉給它：
- 使用者指定的聚焦範圍（如有；沒有就看全貌）
它產出敘事型 overview 後完整轉述（不要摘要壓縮——說明本身就是交付物）。結尾提醒：想深挖某一段可以 /octopus:ask 追問，或 /octopus:overview <範圍> 聚焦重看。
聚焦範圍：$ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 14 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 4f940b3b4521
overview is a command published in the GitHub repository SatoruoGojoo/octopus (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 236 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
guide
Ask the plugin about itself — what a config key does, how the plan gate grades, what the journal can prove — answered from its own docs with a citation for every claim, by the read-only guide agent.
INDEX
Navigation index for dhpk plugin commands. Internal documentation; not an invocable command.
create-release
Cuts a new release of a software project or plugin, coordinating release configuration, version files, changelog, validation, and the fixed git/PR/tag/CI sequence. Not for: PHP package publication or ordinary commits. Output: a validated release preparation or publication result with the human merge gate preserved.
matrix-cell-onboard
Author and review published PHP/Laravel libraries, map testsuites, and plan version-matrix cells. Routes provider/facade design, Testbench setup, Composer contracts, polyfill audits, suite selection, and cell onboarding to separate modes. Not for application code or single-version framework advice. Output follows the…
update-docs
Maintain documentation through stale-doc refresh, architecture codemap generation, or a bounded Markdown refactor. Selects update, codemap, or refactor while preserving each output and evidence contract. Not for application source, tests, manifests, route tables, generated projections, or broad policy review.
verify
Run a repository verification loop with runner-first execution, deterministic stages, and explicit PASS/FAIL/SKIP output. Use for fast or full validation of a consumer repository. Not for: mutation, fixing failures, dependency remediation, or merge approval. Output: runner summary or a complete fallback stage table.