Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to seanrreid/RAD_framework. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/seanrreid/RAD_framework/main/.claude/commands/team/ui-integrity-review.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/seanrreid/RAD_frameworkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/seanrreid/rad_framework/ui-integrity-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/seanrreid/rad_framework/ui-integrity-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/seanrreid/rad_framework/ui-integrity-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/seanrreid/rad_framework/ui-integrity-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/seanrreid/rad_framework/ui-integrity-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00068 | $0.00391 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00027 | $0.00156 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00078 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
ui-integrity-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/ui-integrity-review
Run a UI integrity review on the current branch changes or specified files.
Input
$ARGUMENTS (optional):
- Empty → reviews the frontend files changed since branching from main
- File paths → reviews only those files
--staged→ reviews only staged changes
If $ARGUMENTS is empty and the diff is empty, stop with: "No changes to review —
the current diff is empty. Pass file paths or make changes first."
Process
Invoke the ui-integrity-reviewer agent with $ARGUMENTS as context.
The agent will:
- Read
AGENTS.mdfor the frontend stack (orCLAUDE.mdif the project has noAGENTS.md) - Get the relevant diff or file list and keep the frontend sources
- Trace UI wiring, audit edge inputs, sweep for sibling instances, and audit test assertions
- Output a findings report that shows the sibling sweep, ending with a
rad-findingsblock
Output
The agent's findings are displayed directly. No additional formatting needed.
The review is advisory: it edits no files, writes no .agents/findings.jsonl,
and cannot approve a plan. When run as part of /rad-review, the findings are
persisted by that command's findings step.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 44 lines · 68 tokens per session scan A 946bf6586e69
ui-integrity-review is a command published in the GitHub repository seanrreid/RAD_framework (5 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 391 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-22.
Other commands, from other repositories
refactor
Systematic code refactoring with smart scope detection.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
spec-trace-requirements
You are verifying that implementation changes trace back to specification requirements.
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
boot
Start a new PromptKit prompt assembly session (alias for /bootstrap).