Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/secondsky/sap-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/secondsky/sap-skills/sac-test-onboard)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/secondsky/sap-skills/sac-test-onboard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/secondsky/sap-skills/sac-test-onboard/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/secondsky/sap-skills/sac-test-onboard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/secondsky/sap-skills/sac-test-onboard.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.01311 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00656 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00262 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00131 |
Grade A, and why
sac-test-onboard scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed GPL-3.0
The repository is licensed GPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 126 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A f0e654a3fac5
sac-test-onboard is a command published in the GitHub repository secondsky/sap-skills (438 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed GPL-3.0. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 1,311 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
verify
Verify a SeatLayer integration from static safety checks through the test-mode checkout journey.
maestro-selectors-instructions
Guide to using Maestro selectors for targeting UI elements in tests.
test-author
Write tests first (RED→GREEN→REFACTOR) with Vitest, Testing Library, and Playwright for a Next.js + Supabase app. Use when adding a feature, fixing a bug, or...
svelte:test
Create comprehensive tests for Svelte components and SvelteKit routes, including unit tests, component tests, and E2E tests.
e2e
Legacy slash-entry shim for the e2e-testing skill. Prefer the skill directly.