Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add Security-Phoenix-demo/security-skills-claude-code/plugin install phoenix-security-reviewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/security-phoenix-demo/security-skills-claude-code/threatmodel)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/security-phoenix-demo/security-skills-claude-code/threatmodel"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/security-phoenix-demo/security-skills-claude-code/threatmodel/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/security-phoenix-demo/security-skills-claude-code/threatmodel"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/security-phoenix-demo/security-skills-claude-code/threatmodel.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00313 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00125 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00063 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
threatmodel scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are running the Threat Modeling skill.
Instructions
- Load the skill at
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/threat-modeling/SKILL.md. - Determine scope from
$ARGUMENTS: full repo / feature / component / architecture description. - Follow the skill's 10-step workflow: scope → architecture extraction → STRIDE analysis → DREAD scoring → attack scenarios → attack tree → mitigations → report.
- Output sections (in order):
- System overview (components, trust boundaries, data flows)
- STRIDE threats (grouped by category, each with affected components and attack vectors)
- DREAD risk scores (table, sorted by risk)
- Attack scenarios (top 3-5 chained attacks)
- Attack tree (Mermaid diagram)
- Mitigations (preventive / detective / corrective, prioritized by risk)
- If knowledge graph or CVE intelligence is unavailable, proceed with code-only analysis and note the limitation.
Scope guard
- Read-only. No code changes.
- This is a design-time activity. For diff-level vuln checks use
/security-0day; for full code sweep use/security-audit.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed c3543694ff49
- 2mo ago First seen · 26 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 7ca01495ad06
threatmodel is a command published in the GitHub repository Security-Phoenix-demo/security-skills-claude-code (81 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 313 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
threatmodel compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| threatmodelSecurity-Phoenix-demo/security-skills-claude-code | Command | 81 | 5d ago | MIT | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |