Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/seite-sh/seite/performance-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/seite-sh/seiteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/seite-sh/seite/performance-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/seite-sh/seite/performance-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/seite-sh/seite/performance-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.02408 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01204 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00482 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00241 |
Grade A, and why
performance-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
97% identical to performance-review — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 367 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Performance Review Command
Use this command to analyze content performance data and generate a prioritized queue of content tasks.
Usage
/performance-review [days]
What This Command Does
- Fetches data from Google Analytics, Google Search Console, and DataForSEO
- Analyzes performance trends and opportunities
- Identifies quick wins, declining content, and growth opportunities
- Scores and prioritizes all opportunities by ROI
- Creates actionable task queue with specific next steps
- Generates comprehensive performance report
Process
Data Collection
- Google Analytics 4: Traffic, engagement, conversions, and trends
- Google Search Console: Rankings, impressions, clicks, CTR by page and keyword
- DataForSEO: Competitive rankings, SERP features, keyword metrics
Opportunity Identification
The Performance Agent automatically identifies:
Quick Wins (Highest Priority):
- Keywords ranking positions 11-20 (page 2)
- Closest to page 1 with smallest optimization effort
- Calculated opportunity score based on impressions and position
Declining Content:
- Pages losing traffic month-over-month
- Identifies severity and potential causes
- Prioritizes by traffic volume at risk
Low CTR Opportunities:
- Pages with high impressions but low click-through rates
- Meta title/description improvements needed
- Calculates potential click gains
Trending Topics:
- Queries showing rising search volume
- Early mover advantage opportunities
- Content gaps in growing areas
Competitor Gaps:
- Keywords competitors rank for but seite doesn't
- Strategic positioning opportunities
- Estimated traffic potential
Scoring & Prioritization
Each opportunity receives a score (0-100) based on:
- Impact (50%): Potential traffic gain, conversion value, strategic importance
- Effort (30%): Time required, difficulty, resources needed
- Confidence (20%): Data quality, historical success rate, trend stability
Report Generation
Creates comprehensive report with:
- Executive summary of performance
- Priority queue (urgent/high/medium)
- Detailed opportunity analysis
- Content health dashboard
- Keyword portfolio status
- Resource allocation recommendations
- Week-by-week implementation roadmap
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 367 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 654df3efab48
performance-review is a command published in the GitHub repository seite-sh/seite (20 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,408 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to performance-review, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
awesome-chatgpt
Search awesome-ChatGPT-repositories for open-source GitHub repositories related to ChatGPT and LLMs.
init
Scaffold a new MindBase project (v2 layout). Usage: /mb:init [template] [-- mission ...].
commit
智能生成 Git 提交信息并提交.
pr
Handle the full workflow from current branch state to an open, CI-monitored pull request.
doctor.es
Diagnostica problemas de inferencia LLM en Mac: asiai doctor verifica el estado de los motores, conflictos de puertos, carga de modelos y estado de la GPU.
claude-request
Send a prompt to Claude Code via the LLM gateway with session tracking.