Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/seite-sh/seite/research-gapsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/seite-sh/seiteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/seite-sh/seite/research-gaps)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/seite-sh/seite/research-gaps"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/seite-sh/seite/research-gaps.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00429 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00215 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00086 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
research-gaps scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to research-gaps — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Research Gaps Command
Identify content gaps where competitors rank but you don't.
Usage
/research-gaps
What This Command Does
Analyzes 7 competitors to find keywords they rank for (top 20) that you don't rank for at all:
- Direct Competitors: Configured in
config/competitors.jsonor passed as arguments - Content Competitors: Industry blogs and media sites in your niche
For each gap:
- Filters out branded/irrelevant keywords
- Scores opportunity based on volume, difficulty, and intent
- Determines content type needed (listicle, how-to, guide)
- Prioritizes by potential impact
Process
Execute the competitor gap analysis:
python3 research_competitor_gaps.py
This will:
- Fetch your current ranking keywords from GSC
- Analyze each competitor's top 20 ranking keywords
- Identify gaps (they rank, you don't)
- Enrich with search volume, difficulty, SERP features
- Score and prioritize opportunities
- Generate report:
research/competitor-gaps-YYYY-MM-DD.md
Output
The report includes:
- Top 20 content gap opportunities
- Priority level (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM)
- Competitor intel (who ranks, at what position)
- Keyword metrics (volume, difficulty, CPC)
- Search intent and content type needed
- Specific action steps for each gap
Integration
After running /research-gaps:
- Use
/research-serp [keyword]to analyze what ranks - Use
/write [keyword]to create content brief - Focus on CRITICAL/HIGH priority gaps first
Time & Cost
Time: 3-5 minutes API Cost: ~$1-3 (DataForSEO) - analyzes ~300-500 competitor keywords
When to Run
- Monthly: Full competitive landscape review
- When entering new topic: Find what's missing
- Before content planning: Identify proven opportunities
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 62 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A aea63b3c0549
research-gaps is a command published in the GitHub repository seite-sh/seite (20 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 429 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to research-gaps, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
awesome-chatgpt
Search awesome-ChatGPT-repositories for open-source GitHub repositories related to ChatGPT and LLMs.
init
Scaffold a new MindBase project (v2 layout). Usage: /mb:init [template] [-- mission ...].
commit
智能生成 Git 提交信息并提交.
pr
Handle the full workflow from current branch state to an open, CI-monitored pull request.
doctor.es
Diagnostica problemas de inferencia LLM en Mac: asiai doctor verifica el estado de los motores, conflictos de puertos, carga de modelos y estado de la GPU.
claude-request
Send a prompt to Claude Code via the LLM gateway with session tracking.