Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/senaiverse/reactnative-expo-ai-agent-system-workflow/testgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/senaiverse/reactnative-expo-ai-agent-system-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/senaiverse/reactnative-expo-ai-agent-system-workflow/test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/senaiverse/reactnative-expo-ai-agent-system-workflow/test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/senaiverse/reactnative-expo-ai-agent-system-workflow/test.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00408 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00204 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00082 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00041 |
Grade C, and why
test scanned grade C with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Hidden instructionshighPrompt injection
Directives inside HTML comments, invisible characters or bidirectional overrides are read by the model and not by the person reviewing the file.
<!-- 🌟 SenaiVerse - Claude Code Agent System v1.0 --> What it actually says
Generate Test Suite
Generating tests for: $ARGUMENTS
Test Generation Workflow
Step 1: Analyze Target
- Read the file/component
- Assess complexity (lines, cyclomatic complexity, dependencies)
- Determine business criticality
- Calculate test priority: Complexity × Criticality
Step 2: Determine Test Strategy (@test-architect)
CRITICAL Priority:
- E2E tests (full user journey)
- Integration tests (API, state)
- Unit tests (logic)
- Edge case coverage
HIGH Priority:
- Integration tests
- Unit tests
- Basic edge cases
MEDIUM Priority:
- Unit tests
- Snapshot tests
LOW Priority:
- Snapshot tests only (or skip)
Step 3: Generate Tests (@test-generator)
Create test files with:
- Proper setup/teardown
- Mocking (API, navigation, etc.)
- Async handling
- Edge cases
- Accessibility checks
- Clear test descriptions
Step 4: Run Tests
npm test -- [test-file]
Report:
- ✅ Tests passing
- ❌ Tests failing (with fixes)
- Coverage percentage
Step 5: Validation
Ensure:
- Tests are meaningful (not just coverage boosting)
- Edge cases covered
- Error paths tested
- Async operations handled correctly
Output
Tests Generated: X Coverage: Before X% → After Y% Test Types:
- Unit: X tests
- Integration: X tests
- E2E: X tests
Files Created:
- [List test files]
To Run:
npm test
© 2025 SenaiVerse | Command: /test | Claude Code System v1.0
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 89 lines · 12 tokens per session scan C 16eb8ff52ddb
test is a command published in the GitHub repository senaiverse/reactnative-expo-ai-agent-system-workflow (125 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 408 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it C with 1 finding (hidden instructions). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
golang-test-review
Use when reviewing Go test code (new or changed test.go files, test harnesses, fixtures, or test tooling) for a Go-test-expert pass — behavior-over-surface, determinism, parallel-safety, build-tag correctness, and harness reuse. Complements the general code-reviewer with test-specific rigor.
test-coverage
Analyze test coverage, identify gaps, and generate missing tests to reach 80% project / 90% touched.
pipeline
Execute predefined pipelines for common development workflows.
testing
Comprehensive testing through distributed execution.
tdd
Test-driven development with TodoWrite planning and comprehensive testing.
tester
Comprehensive testing with parallel execution capabilities.