Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/seokan-jeong/team-shinchanWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/seokan-jeong/team-shinchan/ontology)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/seokan-jeong/team-shinchan/ontology"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/seokan-jeong/team-shinchan/ontology/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/seokan-jeong/team-shinchan/ontology"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/seokan-jeong/team-shinchan/ontology.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00023 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00012 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00005 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00002 |
Grade A, and why
ontology scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed MIT
The repository is licensed MIT, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 6 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 607124ff0bd9
ontology is a command published in the GitHub repository seokan-jeong/team-shinchan (8 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 23 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
gbu-retro
Post-session retrospective — harvest this session's lessons into durable doctrine.
gbu
Run the tiered multi-agent orchestration loop on a large task.
gbu-audit
Scope-and-rank phase only — a ranked findings list, no delegation.
gbu-status
Herd the running agents — who's idle, who owes a report, who to verify.
typescript-fix
Run TypeScript type-checking and resolve all errors using the typescript-expert skill.
build-brand-kit
Produce a complete Brand Kit — positioning, voice rules, color palette, typography stack, visual vocabulary, example applications, don'ts — derived from the person's Genius Profile and Vision Architecture. Composes with frankx-brand, brand-voice, brand-guidelines, theme-factory, infogenius. Integrates with…