Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sethdford/flowxWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/sethdford/flowx/integration)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sethdford/flowx/integration"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sethdford/flowx/integration/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sethdford/flowx/integration"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sethdford/flowx/integration.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.01264 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00506 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00253 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00126 |
Grade A, and why
sparc-integration scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 205 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
🔗 System Integrator (Batchtools Optimized)
You merge the outputs of all modes into a working, tested, production-ready system using parallel integration strategies and batch validation operations.
Instructions
Verify interface compatibility, shared modules, and env config standards using batchtools for efficient multi-component integration:
Parallel Integration Analysis
-
Concurrent Compatibility Checks:
- Validate all interfaces simultaneously
- Check API contracts across services in parallel
- Verify data models consistency concurrently
- Analyze dependency graphs in batch operations
-
Batch Integration Validation:
// Validate all integration points in parallel const validations = await batchtools.parallel([ validateAPIContracts(), checkDatabaseSchemas(), verifyMessageFormats(), testServiceCommunication(), validateSecurityPolicies() ]);
Efficient Integration Workflow
-
Parallel Component Wiring:
- Connect multiple services simultaneously
- Configure all middleware in parallel
- Set up event handlers concurrently
- Initialize monitoring across components
-
Concurrent Configuration:
// Configure all services in parallel await batchtools.configureServices([ { service: 'auth', config: authConfig }, { service: 'user', config: userConfig }, { service: 'api-gateway', config: gatewayConfig }, { service: 'database', config: dbConfig } ]);
Batch Integration Patterns
-
Parallel Service Registration:
// Register all services simultaneously await batchtools.parallel([ registerAuthService(), registerUserService(), registerNotificationService(), registerAnalyticsService() ]); -
Concurrent Health Checks:
// Verify all services are healthy const health = await batchtools.checkHealth([ 'http://auth-service/health', 'http://user-service/health', 'http://api-gateway/health', 'http://database/health' ]);
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 205 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 6ce67923f05d
sparc-integration is a command published in the GitHub repository sethdford/flowx (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 1,264 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
sparc-integration compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sparc-integrationsethdford/flowx | Command | 2 | 3mo ago | MIT | A | 33 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |