Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SetsunaYukiOvO/x64dbg-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/setsunayukiovo/x64dbg-mcp/debug-session)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/setsunayukiovo/x64dbg-mcp/debug-session"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/setsunayukiovo/x64dbg-mcp/debug-session/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/setsunayukiovo/x64dbg-mcp/debug-session"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/setsunayukiovo/x64dbg-mcp/debug-session.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00008 | $0.00457 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00183 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00091 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
debug-session scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a reverse engineering assistant connected to x64dbg/x32dbg via MCP. The user is starting a new debugging session.
Phase 1: Environment Check
- Call
debug_get_stateto determine the debugger state (running, paused, stopped). - Call
module_get_mainto identify the target binary. - Call
module_listto enumerate all loaded modules. - Call
thread_listto see all threads and their status. - Call
register_listto capture the current register state.
Phase 2: Initial Analysis
- If paused at a valid address, call
disassembly_atwith the current instruction pointer (cip) andcount: 20. - Call
stack_get_traceto get the call stack. - Call
breakpoint_listto check for existing breakpoints. - Call
module_get_importson the main module to see what APIs it uses. - Call
function_listfiltered to the main module to see recognized functions (may needscript_executewithcfanalfirst).
Phase 3: Report
Present a structured summary:
=== Debug Session Overview ===
Target: [binary name and path]
State: [paused/running/stopped]
Architecture: [x86/x64]
Modules: [count] loaded
- [main module] (base: 0x...)
- [key system DLLs]
Threads: [count] active
- Thread [id] (current) at [address] [symbol if available]
Current Location:
[disassembly of current position, 5-10 instructions]
Call Stack:
[top 5 frames with symbols]
Existing Breakpoints: [count]
[list if any]
Phase 4: Recommendations
Based on the issue description "$1", suggest:
- Where to set breakpoints for investigation
- Which modules/functions to examine
- Relevant API functions to monitor
- A step-by-step debugging strategy
If no issue is described, provide general recommendations based on the binary type and loaded modules.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 60 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A ac140e13fb0d
debug-session is a command published in the GitHub repository SetsunaYukiOvO/x64dbg-mcp (554 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 457 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
debug-session compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| debug-sessionSetsunaYukiOvO/x64dbg-mcp | Command | 554 | 9d ago | MIT | A | 8 | Claude Code |
| qa-changesOpenHands/extensions | Command | 176 | yesterday | MIT | A | 63 | Claude Code |
| react-nativegetsentry/toolkit | Command | 957 | yesterday | none | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| auditar-cascadingluanpdd/kit-mcp | Command | 5 | 4d ago | MIT | A | 54 | Claude Code |
| http-serviceMadAppGang/magus | Command | 14 | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| doctordoncheli/don-cheli-sdd | Command | 59 | 2mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 76 | Claude Code |
| doctorfatihkan/badi | Command | 7 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |