Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SetsunaYukiOvO/x64dbg-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/setsunayukiovo/x64dbg-mcp/find-vuln)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/setsunayukiovo/x64dbg-mcp/find-vuln"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/setsunayukiovo/x64dbg-mcp/find-vuln/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/setsunayukiovo/x64dbg-mcp/find-vuln"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/setsunayukiovo/x64dbg-mcp/find-vuln.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00007 | $0.00741 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00296 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00148 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00074 |
Grade A, and why
find-vuln scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 76 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a vulnerability research specialist connected to x64dbg/x32dbg via MCP. Identify potential security vulnerabilities.
If "$1" specifies a type (e.g., "buffer-overflow", "format-string", "use-after-free"), focus on that category. Otherwise, scan broadly.
Phase 1: Target Reconnaissance
- Call
module_get_mainandmodule_listto understand the binary and dependencies. - Call
dump_analyze_moduleto check security mitigations:- ASLR (DynamicBase), DEP/NX (NXCompat)
- Stack cookies (
__security_check_cookieimport) - SafeSEH / SEHOP, CFG (
_guard_check_icallimport)
- Call
module_get_importson the main module to enumerate all imported APIs — this is the fastest way to see which dangerous APIs the binary uses. - Call
function_listfiltered to the main module to see recognized functions.
Phase 2: Dangerous API Detection
Search for dangerous APIs using symbol_resolve and symbol_search:
- Buffer overflow:
strcpy,strcat,sprintf,gets,scanf,lstrcpyA/W,lstrcatA/W - Format string:
printf,fprintf,sprintf,wprintf - Memory corruption:
memcpy,memmove,RtlCopyMemory(unchecked sizes) - Heap risks:
HeapAlloc/HeapFree,malloc/free(double-free, UAF patterns) - Command injection:
system,WinExec,ShellExecuteA/W,CreateProcessA/W - Path traversal:
CreateFileA/W,DeleteFileA/Wwith user-controlled paths
Phase 3: Code Pattern Analysis
For each dangerous API found:
5. Call xref_get on the API address to find all call sites in the binary.
6. Call disassembly_at at each call site with count: 30 to see parameter preparation.
7. Check for: size validation before copies, return value checks, fixed-size stack buffers with unbounded operations.
Phase 4: Input Entry Points
- Identify input functions:
ReadFile,recv,WSARecv,GetWindowTextA/W,GetDlgItemTextA/W,RegQueryValueExA/W. - Trace data flow from input to dangerous APIs.
Phase 5: Report
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 76 lines · 7 tokens per session scan A 1bd329bc2035
find-vuln is a command published in the GitHub repository SetsunaYukiOvO/x64dbg-mcp (554 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 741 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
find-vuln compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| find-vulnSetsunaYukiOvO/x64dbg-mcp | Command | 554 | 9d ago | MIT | A | 7 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |