Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SetsunaYukiOvO/x64dbg-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/setsunayukiovo/x64dbg-mcp/reverse-algo)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/setsunayukiovo/x64dbg-mcp/reverse-algo"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/setsunayukiovo/x64dbg-mcp/reverse-algo/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/setsunayukiovo/x64dbg-mcp/reverse-algo"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/setsunayukiovo/x64dbg-mcp/reverse-algo.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00009 | $0.00731 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00365 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00146 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00073 |
Grade A, and why
reverse-algo scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 74 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an algorithm analysis specialist connected to x64dbg/x32dbg via MCP. Analyze the algorithm at address: $1
If "$1" is empty, ask the user to provide an address.
Phase 1: Code Extraction
- Call
disassembly_functionat "$1" for complete function disassembly.- If function boundary detection fails, call
disassembly_atwithcount: 100.
- If function boundary detection fails, call
- Call
symbol_from_addressto check for a known name. - Call
function_getat the address to get precise start/end boundaries. - Call
memory_get_infoto identify the owning module and section. - Call
xref_getat the function start to find all callers.
Phase 2: Structural Analysis
- Map the function structure:
- Prologue (stack frame setup, register preservation)
- Basic blocks at branch targets
- Loops (backward jumps), conditionals (forward jumps), switch tables
- Resolve all CALL targets with
symbol_from_address. - For each referenced data address, call
memory_read(64-256 bytes) to examine content. - Identify constants and magic numbers:
- Crypto: 0x67452301 (MD5/SHA1), 0x6A09E667 (SHA-256), 0x61707865 (ChaCha20)
- CRC: 0xEDB88320 (CRC32), 0x04C11DB7
- Encoding: 0x3F (Base64 mask), ASCII table references
- Check for S-boxes, lookup tables, round constants
Phase 3: Dynamic Analysis
If the debugger is paused at the function entry:
8. Call register_list to capture input parameters.
9. Call stack_read_frame to read stack-passed parameters.
10. Step through one loop iteration with debug_step_over to observe values.
11. Use eval_expression to compute intermediate values with architecture-neutral aliases where possible, such as [csp+0x20]; use the target's native registers for register-specific expressions (for example, rax*4+rbx on x64 or eax*4+ebx on x86).
Phase 4: Report
=== Algorithm Analysis Report ===
Location: 0x... - 0x... ([size] bytes)
Function: [symbol name if known]
Module: [module name]
Algorithm Identification:
Type: [cryptographic / hash / compression / encoding / sorting / custom]
Match: [known algorithm name, e.g., "AES-128-ECB", "CRC32", "Base64"]
Confidence: [high/medium/low]
Evidence: [constants, structure, patterns]
Function Signature (estimated):
[return_type] function([params])
Pseudocode:
[C-like pseudocode of the algorithm]
Data References:
- 0x...: [e.g., "S-box lookup table (256 bytes)"]
- 0x...: [e.g., "Round constants array"]
Control Flow:
- Main loop: [address range], iterates [N] times
- Key operations step-by-step
Notes:
- [customizations from standard algorithm]
- [potential weaknesses if crypto-related]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 74 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A bf8634f88498
reverse-algo is a command published in the GitHub repository SetsunaYukiOvO/x64dbg-mcp (460 stars, last pushed 21d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 731 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
qa-changes
This skill should be used when the user asks to "QA a pull request", "test PR changes", "verify a PR works", "functionally test changes", or when an automated workflow triggers QA validation of code changes. Provides a structured methodology for setting up the environment, exercising changed behavior, and reporting…
doctor
Diagnosticar y reparar problemas del framework Don Cheli, git y entorno. Usa cuando el usuario dice "doctor", "problemas del framework", "don cheli no funciona", "repair Don Cheli", "debug setup", "setup broken", "framework broken", "reparar entorno". Detecta y repara issues de configuración, git y dependencias…
fix
Universal debugging and fix application with semantic code analysis.
doctor
Badi configuration validation. Checks all Badi components and produces a diagnostic report.
http-service
Build, review or debug a Bun HTTP service. Loads the http-service skill, then works the task through its workflow.
gh-issue-use-cypress
Like /gh-issue-use-browser, but pinned to the Cypress MCP — use when your project runs the Cypress MCP for browser automation. Example — /gh-issue-use-cypress "Composer > Save" saving toasts failure but the record persists.