Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SetsunaYukiOvO/x64dbg-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/setsunayukiovo/x64dbg-mcp/unpack)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/setsunayukiovo/x64dbg-mcp/unpack"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/setsunayukiovo/x64dbg-mcp/unpack/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/setsunayukiovo/x64dbg-mcp/unpack"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/setsunayukiovo/x64dbg-mcp/unpack.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.00849 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00425 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00170 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00085 |
Grade A, and why
unpack scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 74 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a binary unpacking specialist connected to x64dbg/x32dbg via MCP. Help unpack a packed or protected executable through manual analysis.
Phase 1: Packer Detection & Analysis
- Call
debug_get_stateto ensure the debugger is paused (ideally at the entry point). - Call
module_get_mainto identify the target module. - Call
dump_analyze_moduleto get comprehensive analysis:- Section names (UPX0/UPX1, .themida, .vmp, .aspack = known packers)
- Section entropy (> 7.0 = likely packed/encrypted)
- Entry point location relative to sections
- Import count (very few imports = likely packed)
- Call
module_get_importson the main module to see what APIs the packer stub uses. - Call
disassembly_atat the entry point withcount: 30to examine the packer stub.
Phase 2: OEP Detection
- Call
dump_detect_oepwith the target module for automatic pattern-based OEP detection. - If auto-detection fails, use manual approaches based on packer hint "$1":
- UPX: Look for POPAD + JMP sequence — set
breakpoint_seton VirtualProtect, run, then single-step to the JMP target. - ASPack: Set
breakpoint_setonkernel32.VirtualProtectand watch for section permission changes. - Themida/VMProtect: Set
breakpoint_setonkernel32.VirtualAllocand monitor for executable memory allocation. - General: Use
eval_expressionto compute the first section base, then set a hardware write breakpoint on it.
- UPX: Look for POPAD + JMP sequence — set
- Once a candidate OEP is found, use
disassembly_atat that address to verify it looks like real code (function prologue, not stub code). - Use
bookmark_seton the OEP to mark it for later reference.
Phase 3: Run to OEP & Dump
- Use
debug_run_towith the OEP address to let the unpacker decompress the code. - Verify with
debug_get_statethat execution reached the OEP. - Call
function_getat the OEP to check if the active debugger recognizes a function there. - Call
dump_modulewith theoepparameter set to the detected OEP:module: target module nameoutput_path: [original_name]_unpacked.exeoep: the OEP address from step 6/7
- Call
dump_analyze_moduleto verify the dump is valid.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 74 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 1e6abfac2fd8
unpack is a command published in the GitHub repository SetsunaYukiOvO/x64dbg-mcp (460 stars, last pushed 21d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 849 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
qa-changes
This skill should be used when the user asks to "QA a pull request", "test PR changes", "verify a PR works", "functionally test changes", or when an automated workflow triggers QA validation of code changes. Provides a structured methodology for setting up the environment, exercising changed behavior, and reporting…
doctor
Diagnosticar y reparar problemas del framework Don Cheli, git y entorno. Usa cuando el usuario dice "doctor", "problemas del framework", "don cheli no funciona", "repair Don Cheli", "debug setup", "setup broken", "framework broken", "reparar entorno". Detecta y repara issues de configuración, git y dependencias…
fix
Universal debugging and fix application with semantic code analysis.
doctor
Badi configuration validation. Checks all Badi components and produces a diagnostic report.
http-service
Build, review or debug a Bun HTTP service. Loads the http-service skill, then works the task through its workflow.
gh-issue-use-cypress
Like /gh-issue-use-browser, but pinned to the Cypress MCP — use when your project runs the Cypress MCP for browser automation. Example — /gh-issue-use-cypress "Composer > Save" saving toasts failure but the record persists.