Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/severity1/claude-agent-sdk-go/tdd-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/severity1/claude-agent-sdk-goWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00013 | $0.02989 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.01494 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00598 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00299 |
Grade A, and why
tdd-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 313 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
TDD Code Review (Team-Based)
Comprehensive code review for the Go SDK. Orchestrates multiple reviewers to analyze Go idioms, error handling, type design, test coverage, and Python SDK parity.
Prerequisite: Load Deferred Tools
Team and task orchestration tools (TeamCreate, TeamDelete, TaskCreate, TaskUpdate, TaskList, TaskGet, SendMessage, AskUserQuestion) are deferred in this harness. Before entering Phase 1, load them via:
ToolSearch(query="select:TeamCreate,TeamDelete,TaskCreate,TaskUpdate,TaskList,TaskGet,SendMessage,AskUserQuestion", max_results=8)
Skip this for quick-mode runs.
Quick Mode Exception
For focused reviews, use a single bare Agent call (model: "sonnet") with NO team:
--quick— Onlygrumpy-gopher--errors— Onlypr-review-toolkit:silent-failure-hunter--types— Onlypr-review-toolkit:type-design-analyzer--tests— Onlypr-review-toolkit:pr-test-analyzer--parity—grumpy-gopherwith explicit instructions to cross-referencedocs/tracking/README.mdand../claude-agent-sdk-python/for Python SDK divergence
If $ARGUMENTS contains any of these flags, extract the flag, launch the single appropriate agent with the file list, present results, and stop. Do not create a team, do not load team tools.
Review Scope Detection
Determine what code to review:
- User-specified files: If user provided specific files or packages after the flag/arguments, use those.
- Unstaged changes:
git diff --name-only - Staged changes:
git diff --staged --name-only - Default: Current package (
./...)
git diff --name-only
git diff --staged --name-only
Store the file list. If no files found, report and exit cleanly (no team created).
Reviewer Selection
Based on files identified, select reviewers:
| File Pattern | Reviewer |
|---|---|
internal/control/* |
grumpy-gopher, pr-review-toolkit:silent-failure-hunter |
internal/parser/* |
grumpy-gopher, pr-review-toolkit:silent-failure-hunter |
internal/subprocess/* |
grumpy-gopher, pr-review-toolkit:silent-failure-hunter |
internal/cli/* |
grumpy-gopher |
internal/shared/* |
grumpy-gopher, pr-review-toolkit:type-design-analyzer |
Root *.go (public API: client.go, query.go, options.go, errors.go, transport.go) |
grumpy-gopher, pr-review-toolkit:type-design-analyzer |
*_test.go, *_bench_test.go |
pr-review-toolkit:pr-test-analyzer |
examples/* |
grumpy-gopher (informational only) |
| Any Go file | grumpy-gopher, pr-review-toolkit:silent-failure-hunter (always) |
| Scope spans 2+ packages | Add pr-review-toolkit:code-reviewer |
| Diff adds large docstrings/comment blocks | Add pr-review-toolkit:comment-analyzer |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 313 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 0f59cce98ce4
tdd-review is a command published in the GitHub repository severity1/claude-agent-sdk-go (169 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 2,989 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
README
Git workflow and quality assurance commands for the claude-skills repository.
agentlas-cloud
Staff a task only from the signed-in owner's Agent Cloud agents.
research-perplexity
Run a deep research query using Perplexity's /research mode via Playwright browser automation. This is an alternative to /export-to-council that uses Perplexity's dedicated research mode instead of multi-model council.
dispatcher
Pick the next-best repo to work on across the portfolio — rank free repos, recommend one, claim its lease atomically, and route to the entry command.
tldr
Re-apply TLDR rules for this turn (verdict first, no filler).
execute
Interactive workflow for workspace isolation, pane-delegated implementation, testing, review, and cleanup.