Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shaharsha/claude-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/shaharsha/claude-skills/arm-inbox)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/shaharsha/claude-skills/arm-inbox"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/shaharsha/claude-skills/arm-inbox/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/shaharsha/claude-skills/arm-inbox"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/shaharsha/claude-skills/arm-inbox.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00260 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00130 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00052 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00026 |
Grade A, and why
arm-inbox scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Retired. There is nothing to arm.
ccarm, ccsend --self and the FRESH LEASE check are gone. Cross-session messaging is on for
every session ≥ v2.1.224 with nothing to enable. Below that version a session binds no socket,
appears in no listing, and looks normal from the inside.
Where the content that used to live here now lives — one copy each, deliberately:
addressing · TITLE vs NAME · ccpeers /dispatch §1 · /worker §1
channel failure modes (HELD/CAPPED/…) /dispatch "The channel is better…"
what carries what, RECORD vs MESSAGE LANE-PREAMBLE.md §8
who is stuck ccstatus — messaging never answered this
⚠️ Do not re-add that material here. This file was a third copy of rules that already had homes, and a rule written in two places for two readers is a disagreement waiting to be found by whoever is caught between them. Delete this file rather than growing it.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 23 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 19bb1b0ec107
arm-inbox is a command published in the GitHub repository shaharsha/claude-skills (5 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 260 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.