Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add shalomeir/gemini-plugin-cc/plugin install geminiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/shalomeir/gemini-plugin-cc/ui-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/shalomeir/gemini-plugin-cc/ui-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/shalomeir/gemini-plugin-cc/ui-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/shalomeir/gemini-plugin-cc/ui-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/shalomeir/gemini-plugin-cc/ui-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.00361 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00180 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00072 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00036 |
Grade A, and why
ui-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review UI implementation by comparing screenshots with code.
Raw slash-command arguments:
$ARGUMENTS
This command leverages Gemini's native multimodal support to analyze screenshots alongside the code that produces them.
Core constraint:
- This command is review-only.
- Do not fix issues or apply patches.
- Return Gemini's output verbatim to the user.
Execution mode rules:
- If the raw arguments include
--background, run in background without asking. - Otherwise, run in the foreground by default.
Foreground flow:
- Run:
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/gemini-companion.mjs" ui-review "$ARGUMENTS"
- Return the command stdout verbatim, exactly as-is.
- Do not paraphrase, summarize, or add commentary.
Background flow:
- Launch with
Bashin the background:
Bash({
command: `node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/gemini-companion.mjs" ui-review --background "$ARGUMENTS"`,
description: "Gemini UI review",
run_in_background: true
})
- After launching, tell the user: "Gemini UI review started in the background. Check
/gemini:statusfor progress."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 43 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A d7d93baea2d7
ui-review is a command published in the GitHub repository shalomeir/gemini-plugin-cc (4 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 361 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
critique
Design lens critique covering visual hierarchy, clarity, and anti-slop patterns — produces a findings table, no code edits unless asked. Use when the user wants a design review, says "what's wrong with this UI", or needs a second opinion before a handoff or presentation.
audit
A project review command that checks both the user interface and the code. It can inspect design rules, accessibility, performance, security, and code quality at different levels of depth.
hld-review
Review High-Level Design (HLD) against architecture principles and requirements.
pi-ui-review
UI/UX review via Gemini — accessibility, responsive design, component structure.
ui-flow-review
Review menus, HUD, navigation, and player flow from a UX perspective.
design-system-review
Analyze design token usage and component consistency.