appeal-strategy

appeal-strategy is a command for Claude Code from shashionline/indian-law-plugin. It costs 4 tokens per session (4,604 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of appeal-strategy, MIT.

A command for helping with criminal appeals and revision applications in India. It gathers case details, identifies the appropriate court and appeal type, and guides the preparation of an application.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to work through appeals from convictions, acquittals, or sentences, including the lower court, timing, custody, bail, and reasons for challenge. It is intended for Indian criminal-law matters.
Why use it?
It organizes the legal information needed to choose an appellate route and develop grounds for challenging a decision. Without those details, an appeal may be directed to the wrong court or omit important facts.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Not installable: its command points at a path on the author’s own machine, so it runs nowhere else. The line is /Users/swarochishchekuri/Downloads/ClaudeBrain_test/Protocols/criminal_law/IL-CRIM-APPEALS.md.

Part of the indian-law plugin — 13 skills, 32 commands, 15 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to work through appeals from convictions, acquittals, or sentences, including the lower court, timing, custody, bail, and reasons for challenge. It is intended for Indian criminal-law matters.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add shashionline/indian-law-plugin
Claude Code
/plugin install indian-law

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install indian-law, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 13 skills, 32 commands, 15 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for appeal-strategy

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/shashionline/indian-law-plugin/appeal-strategy/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/shashionline/indian-law-plugin/appeal-strategy)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/shashionline/indian-law-plugin/appeal-strategy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/shashionline/indian-law-plugin/appeal-strategy/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for appeal-strategy

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/shashionline/indian-law-plugin/appeal-strategy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/shashionline/indian-law-plugin/appeal-strategy.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 4 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 4,604 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00004 $0.04604
Opus 5 $0.00002 $0.02302
Sonnet 5 $0.00001 $0.00921
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00460

Measured 11d ago against content hash f87b3ffb2b99, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

appeal-strategy scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to appeal-strategy — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

commands/appeal-strategy.md · 586 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 586 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are assisting with criminal appeals and revision applications in India.

Task: Guide user through appellate strategy and draft appeal/revision applications.

Workflow:

  1. Read Protocol:

    • Read /Users/swarochishchekuri/Downloads/ClaudeBrain_test/Protocols/criminal_law/IL-CRIM-APPEALS.md for comprehensive appellate guidance
  2. Gather Information: Ask user (if not provided):

    • What is being appealed? (Conviction, acquittal, sentence)
    • Which court's order? (Magistrate, Sessions Court, High Court)
    • Date of order: When was judgment/order passed?
    • Grounds for appeal: Why should appellate court interfere?
    • Conviction details (if applicable): Offence, sentence awarded
    • Already in custody?: Is appellant in jail?
    • Bail status: If convicted, is appellant on bail or in custody?
  3. Determine Appeal Type and Forum:

    **APPELLATE HIERARCHY**:
    
    **1. Appeal to Sessions Court** (Section 374 CrPC / 432 BNSS):
    - **From**: Order of Magistrate
    - **Who can appeal**: Convicted person OR Prosecution (limited)
    - **Timeline**: 30 days from date of order
    - **Scope**: Appeal on facts and law
    
    **2. Appeal to High Court** (Sections 374, 377, 378 CrPC / 432-436 BNSS):
    
    A. **Against Sessions Court Conviction** (Section 374):
       - Appeal by convicted person
       - Timeline: 30 days from conviction
       - Scope: Facts, law, quantum of sentence
    
    B. **Against Acquittal** (Section 378):
       - Appeal by State/Complainant (with leave)
       - Timeline: 60 days from acquittal
       - High Court can reverse acquittal
    
    C. **Reference by Sessions Judge** (Section 377):
       - If Sessions Court awards death sentence → mandatory confirmation by High Court
    
    **3. Appeal to Supreme Court** (Article 134 / Section 379 CrPC / 437 BNSS):
    - **From**: High Court judgment
    - **Timeline**: 60 days from High Court order
    - **When**: If High Court certifies case fit for appeal OR Special Leave Petition (Article 136)
    
    **4. Special Leave Petition (SLP)** (Article 136):
    - **To**: Supreme Court directly
    - **From**: Any court order (if appeal not available)
    - **Timeline**: 90 days from order
    - **Discretionary**: Supreme Court decides whether to grant leave
    
    **5. Revision Application** (Section 397 CrPC / 456 BNSS):
    - **Not an appeal** - revisional jurisdiction
    - Filed before Sessions Court or High Court
    - Against orders of subordinate courts
    - **Limited scope**: Illegality, jurisdictional error, material irregularity
    
  4. Check Limitation Period:

    **LIMITATION PERIODS**:
    
    | Appeal Type | Timeline | Condonable? |
    |-------------|----------|-------------|
    | Appeal to Sessions Court | 30 days | Yes (sufficient cause) |
    | Appeal to High Court (conviction) | 30 days | Yes (sufficient cause) |
    | Appeal to High Court (acquittal) | 60 days | Yes (sufficient cause) |
    | Appeal to Supreme Court | 60 days | Yes (if High Court certificate) |
    | SLP to Supreme Court | 90 days | Limited discretion |
    | Revision | No fixed period | Court's discretion |
    
    **Delay Condonation**:
    - File application for condonation of delay
    - Show "sufficient cause" for delay
    - Attach supporting documents (medical certificates, etc.)
    
  5. Identify Grounds for Appeal:

    **COMMON GROUNDS FOR APPEAL**:
    
    **A. Against Conviction**:
    
    1. **Perverse Findings of Fact**:
       - Trial court findings contrary to evidence
       - Appreciation of evidence illegal/improper
       - Ignored material evidence
    
    2. **Burden of Proof Not Discharged**:
       - Prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt
       - Benefit of doubt should have been given
    
    3. **Evidence Inadmissible**:
       - Evidence should not have been admitted (e.g., no Section 65B certificate)
       - Confession to police wrongly admitted (Section 25 violation)
    
    4. **Procedural Violations**:
       - No Section 313 examination (fatal irregularity - Rahim Beg case)
       - Illegal arrest/search (D.K. Basu violation)
       - Charge not framed properly
    
    5. **Misapplication of Law**:
       - Wrong offence applied
       - Essential ingredients not proved
       - Exception should have been accepted
    
    6. **Circumstantial Evidence Defective**:
       - Chain incomplete (Panchsheel Principles not met)
       - Alternative hypothesis not excluded
    
    **B. Against Acquittal** (By State):
    
    1. **Perverse Acquittal**:
       - Acquittal shocking to judicial conscience
       - Evidence clearly established guilt but ignored
    
    2. **Misreading of Evidence**:
       - Trial court misread/ignored prosecution evidence
    
    NOTE: High Court interference with acquittal rare (double presumption of innocence)
    
    **C. Against Sentence** (Even if conviction upheld):
    
    1. **Sentence Excessive**:
       - Not proportionate to offence
       - Mitigating factors ignored
       - First-time offender treated harshly
    
    2. **Sentence Inadequate** (State appeal):
       - Heinous offence but lenient sentence
       - Deterrence required
    

Read the full file on GitHub · 586 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 586 lines · 4 tokens per session scan A f87b3ffb2b99

Subscribe to this mod's changes

appeal-strategy is a command published in the GitHub repository shashionline/indian-law-plugin (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 4 tokens to every session and 4,604 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to appeal-strategy, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.