Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shashionline/indian-law-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/shashionline/indian-law-plugin/check-writ)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/shashionline/indian-law-plugin/check-writ"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/shashionline/indian-law-plugin/check-writ/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/shashionline/indian-law-plugin/check-writ"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/shashionline/indian-law-plugin/check-writ.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.02430 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.01215 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00486 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00243 |
Grade A, and why
check-writ scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to check-writ — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 318 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/check-writ - Writ Petition Viability Checker
Command Purpose
Comprehensive writ petition viability analysis tool that assesses whether filing a writ petition (mandamus, certiorari, prohibition, habeas corpus, quo warranto) under Article 226 (High Court) or Article 32 (Supreme Court) is appropriate for your case.
How It Works
This command launches the writ-petition-analyzer skill through an interactive Q&A session that systematically evaluates:
- Whether respondent is "State" (Article 12)
- Your locus standi (standing to file)
- Alternative remedy requirements
- Grounds for judicial review
- Appropriate writ type
- Likelihood of success
- Strategic recommendations
When to Use
- Government authority denied your application/permission
- Government order you want to challenge
- Government refusing to perform mandatory duty
- Illegal detention by authorities
- Unauthorized person holding public office
- Need urgent judicial intervention against government action
Usage
/check-writ
OR with case context:
/check-writ Municipality denied my building permission without valid reason
/check-writ Passport approved but not issued for 60 days
Workflow
When you invoke /check-writ, I will conduct systematic legal analysis:
Step 1: Case Facts Gathering
I'll ask you structured questions:
Q1: What is the government action/inaction you want to challenge?
- Order passed (denying permission, rejecting application, etc.)?
- Inaction (duty not performed, service not delivered)?
- Detention?
- Appointment to public office?
Q2: Which authority is involved?
- Central/State Government department?
- Local body (municipality, panchayat)?
- PSU, statutory corporation?
- Private entity?
Q3: When did this happen?
- Date of impugned order (if challenging an order)
- Date when duty should have been performed
- How long ago? (Check for laches/delay)
Q4: What did you do before approaching court?
- Filed application/representation?
- Pursued departmental appeal/tribunal?
- Filed RTI, CPGRAMS grievance?
- Sent legal notice?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 318 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A eb89419da4fd
check-writ is a command published in the GitHub repository shashionline/indian-law-plugin (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 2,430 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to check-writ, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
deps-audit
Audit project dependencies for vulnerabilities, outdated packages, license conflicts, and supply chain risks — then provide actionable remediation strategies.
review-epo-claims
Analyze patent claims for EPO Art. 84 EPC compliance - clarity, conciseness, support by description.
voice-compliance
Voice/telephony compliance check — invokes voice-ai-reviewer to produce TM-voice-{slug}.md with TCPA, STIR/SHAKEN, state recording-consent, EU AI Act Art. 50, and synth-voice deepfake-law gaps.
review-policy
Review a policy document for structure, coverage, and language quality.
at-dsgvo
You are helping an enterprise architect generate an Austrian Data Protection Assessment — the Austrian-specific GDPR layer applied by the Datenschutzbehörde (DSB) under the Datenschutzgesetz (DSG 2018, BGBl. I Nr. 165/1999 as amended). Run this after /arckit:eu-rgpd to add Austrian obligations that go beyond the EU…
au-pspf
You are an enterprise architect generating a Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) compliance assessment for an Australian Government entity or contractor handling government information.