Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shashionline/indian-law-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/shashionline/indian-law-plugin/contract-advice)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/shashionline/indian-law-plugin/contract-advice"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/shashionline/indian-law-plugin/contract-advice/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/shashionline/indian-law-plugin/contract-advice"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/shashionline/indian-law-plugin/contract-advice.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00003 | $0.00455 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00228 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00091 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
contract-advice scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to contract-advice — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Contract Advice Command
Task: Provide comprehensive legal advice on contract-related issues under Indian law.
Workflow
-
Gather Context:
- Contract type (general, sale, guarantee, bailment, agency, partnership)
- Stage (pre-formation, formation, performance, breach, dispute)
- Specific issue (validity, performance, breach, rights, remedies)
- Key facts (parties, subject matter, consideration, dates, status)
-
Load Relevant Protocols:
- Formation: IL-CONTRACT-FORMATION, IL-CONTRACT-CAPACITY, IL-CONTRACT-FREE-CONSENT, IL-CONTRACT-LEGALITY
- Performance: IL-CONTRACT-PERFORMANCE, IL-CONTRACT-DISCHARGE, IL-CONTRACT-IMPOSSIBILITY
- Breach/Remedies: IL-CONTRACT-BREACH, IL-CONTRACT-DAMAGES, IL-CONTRACT-SPECIFIC-PERFORMANCE, IL-CONTRACT-INJUNCTION, IL-CONTRACT-RESCISSION
- Special Contracts: IL-CONTRACT-SALE-OF-GOODS, IL-CONTRACT-INDEMNITY-GUARANTEE, IL-CONTRACT-BAILMENT-PLEDGE, IL-CONTRACT-AGENCY, IL-CONTRACT-PARTNERSHIP
-
Analyze:
- Validity: Section 10 elements check → Valid/Voidable/Void determination
- Performance: Obligations (who, when, where, how) + discharge methods
- Breach: Classification (actual/anticipatory, material/non-material) + remedies
- Apply statutory sections + landmark cases
-
Provide Advice:
- Legal analysis (statutory basis + case law)
- Rights and obligations (yours + other party's)
- Remedies available (primary + alternatives with viability)
- Risks and defenses
- Recommendations (immediate actions + strategy)
- Evidence required + timeline (limitation period)
Use contract-law-specialist or contract-remedies-expert agents for deeper analysis.
Version: 1.0.0
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 41 lines · 3 tokens per session scan A 15d39b74c1c2
contract-advice is a command published in the GitHub repository shashionline/indian-law-plugin (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 3 tokens to every session and 455 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to contract-advice, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
deps-audit
Audit project dependencies for vulnerabilities, outdated packages, license conflicts, and supply chain risks — then provide actionable remediation strategies.
review-epo-claims
Analyze patent claims for EPO Art. 84 EPC compliance - clarity, conciseness, support by description.
voice-compliance
Voice/telephony compliance check — invokes voice-ai-reviewer to produce TM-voice-{slug}.md with TCPA, STIR/SHAKEN, state recording-consent, EU AI Act Art. 50, and synth-voice deepfake-law gaps.
review-policy
Review a policy document for structure, coverage, and language quality.
at-dsgvo
You are helping an enterprise architect generate an Austrian Data Protection Assessment — the Austrian-specific GDPR layer applied by the Datenschutzbehörde (DSB) under the Datenschutzgesetz (DSG 2018, BGBl. I Nr. 165/1999 as amended). Run this after /arckit:eu-rgpd to add Austrian obligations that go beyond the EU…
au-pspf
You are an enterprise architect generating a Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) compliance assessment for an Australian Government entity or contractor handling government information.