Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shashionline/indian-law-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/shashionline/indian-law-plugin/resolve-labour-dispute)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/shashionline/indian-law-plugin/resolve-labour-dispute"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/shashionline/indian-law-plugin/resolve-labour-dispute/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/shashionline/indian-law-plugin/resolve-labour-dispute"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/shashionline/indian-law-plugin/resolve-labour-dispute.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.04146 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.02073 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00829 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00415 |
Grade A, and why
resolve-labour-dispute scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to resolve-labour-dispute — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 365 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Slash Command: /resolve-labour-dispute - Comprehensive Labour Dispute Resolution Strategy
Purpose
Analyze employment termination, wrongful discharge, or statutory benefits dispute, assess domestic enquiry compliance, calculate all statutory dues (PF/ESI/Gratuity/Bonus), evaluate reinstatement prospects, and provide complete dispute resolution strategy from settlement to labor court litigation.
Usage
/resolve-labour-dispute <dispute-description>
What This Command Does
When you invoke /resolve-labour-dispute, I will systematically:
-
Employment Status Assessment:
- Determine workman vs non-workman status (wage threshold < Rs. 10,000/month)
- Calculate continuous service period (for statutory benefits eligibility)
- Identify applicable laws (ID Act, Factories Act, Shops & Establishments Act)
-
Statutory Benefits Calculation:
- PF (Provident Fund): Employee + Employer contributions (12% each on Basic + DA)
- ESI (Employee State Insurance): 0.75% employee + 3.25% employer (if wage ≤ Rs. 21,000)
- Gratuity: (Last drawn salary × 15 days × Years) / 26 (if 5+ years service)
- Bonus: 8.33% minimum (if wage ≤ Rs. 21,000, establishment 20+ employees)
- Leave Encashment: Earned leave balance × Daily wage
- Notice Pay: 1 month (if termination without notice)
- Retrenchment Compensation: 15 days average pay × Years (if retrenchment)
-
Domestic Enquiry Compliance Audit:
- Verify charge sheet adequacy (specific allegations, reasonable time to respond)
- Assess enquiry officer independence (not biased/interested party)
- Check opportunity to defend (witness examination, cross-examination rights)
- Evaluate findings (evidence-based, not assumptions)
- Determine procedural justice compliance (natural justice principles)
-
Section 25F Retrenchment Compliance (If Applicable):
- Notice: 1 month OR notice pay ✓/✗
- Retrenchment Compensation: 15 days × Years ✓/✗
- Government Approval: If 100+ workers ✓/✗
- Compliance Status: VALID / INVALID
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 365 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 57e58d770fe1
resolve-labour-dispute is a command published in the GitHub repository shashionline/indian-law-plugin (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 4,146 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to resolve-labour-dispute, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
deps-audit
Audit project dependencies for vulnerabilities, outdated packages, license conflicts, and supply chain risks — then provide actionable remediation strategies.
review-epo-claims
Analyze patent claims for EPO Art. 84 EPC compliance - clarity, conciseness, support by description.
voice-compliance
Voice/telephony compliance check — invokes voice-ai-reviewer to produce TM-voice-{slug}.md with TCPA, STIR/SHAKEN, state recording-consent, EU AI Act Art. 50, and synth-voice deepfake-law gaps.
review-policy
Review a policy document for structure, coverage, and language quality.
at-dsgvo
You are helping an enterprise architect generate an Austrian Data Protection Assessment — the Austrian-specific GDPR layer applied by the Datenschutzbehörde (DSB) under the Datenschutzgesetz (DSG 2018, BGBl. I Nr. 165/1999 as amended). Run this after /arckit:eu-rgpd to add Austrian obligations that go beyond the EU…
au-pspf
You are an enterprise architect generating a Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) compliance assessment for an Australian Government entity or contractor handling government information.