Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shining319/claude-code-single-person-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/shining319/claude-code-single-person-workflow/academic-writing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/shining319/claude-code-single-person-workflow/academic-writing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/shining319/claude-code-single-person-workflow/academic-writing.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00009 | $0.00042 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00021 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00008 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00004 |
Grade A, and why
academic-writing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Use the academic-writing-style skill. User input: $ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 7 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A 91fb999ceb8b
academic-writing is a command published in the GitHub repository shining319/claude-code-single-person-workflow (21 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 42 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
review
Cold re-quiz on code that already shipped — your own session commits, not the change in front of you.
learn-story-flow
Learn story-flow concepts with interactive guidance for junior developers.
annex-a-deep-dive
Deep dive analysis of ISO 27001 Annex A control domains with implementation guidance.
start-10-1
A guided lesson on setting up clasp, a command-line tool for managing Google Apps Script projects, and connecting it to Google’s Apps Script API.
start-13-4.en
Welcome to Lesson 13-4: Landing Page Implementation!
start-0-8
A Japanese-language command that displays the current project setup progress.