Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to shotgun-sh/shotgun. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/shotgun-sh/shotgun/main/.claude/commands/review.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shotgun-sh/shotgunWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/shotgun-sh/shotgun/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/shotgun-sh/shotgun/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/shotgun-sh/shotgun/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/shotgun-sh/shotgun/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/shotgun-sh/shotgun/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00186 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00074 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00037 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00019 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review the current pull request to look for things like: Inline imports = We must remove these unless they are truly needed. dicts being returned by services/routers that should be Pydantic Models. Pydantic Model classes should be moved to a models.py file in the appropriate folder. Any leftover TODOs = We need to identify these so we can create a plan to mitigate them. Any strings that are being passed around the should be StrEnum (in Python) or an enum in Typescript. Look for database calls made directly in a router, this is a no no, that should at least be in a Service and preferably in a Repository if it can be re-used at all. Look for excessive database calls in a service that could be moved to a repository to be more easily shared and more DRY. Duplicate code, or code that should be a utility so that it can be re-used and more DRY.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 10 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A ebf42ed559ba
review is a command published in the GitHub repository shotgun-sh/shotgun (685 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 186 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
anchors
List what each requirement tag anchors to (read-only).
review-team
Parallel code review with 3 specialist lenses plus the kit-default kit:advisor extra lens. Dispatches the security, architecture, and test-coverage lenses simultaneously, adds the cross-cutting kit:advisor (critique mode), then merges findings.
cc-review
(Conductor) Review code changes against spec and standards.
advanced-code-review-context
Advanced Code Review Phase 2: Context Analysis - load previous reviews, PR history, declined items.
devs-team
Parallel multi-lens critique of a solution design (the active spec if present, else the decision brief). Dispatches 5 engineering lenses, merges findings, reports a verdict. Report-only, never blocks.