domain

domain is a command for Claude Code from shuotao/REVIT_MCP_study. It costs 0 tokens per session (941 once invoked), scanned A, original, no licence file.

A command that turns a successful workflow from the current conversation into a standard operating procedure and saves it in the domain/ directory.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to document repeatable workflows as standard procedures.
Why use it?
It converts one-off work into written instructions that can be reused later.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/shuotao/revit_mcp_study/domain
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shuotao/REVIT_MCP_study

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for domain

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/shuotao/revit_mcp_study/domain.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/shuotao/revit_mcp_study/domain)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/shuotao/revit_mcp_study/domain"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/shuotao/revit_mcp_study/domain.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 941 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.00941
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00470
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00188
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00094

Measured 6d ago against content hash 850b045bde1f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-05, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

domain scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/domain.md · 82 lines

The source is not reproduced here

No licence file

A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago First seen · 82 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 850b045bde1f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

domain is a command published in the GitHub repository shuotao/REVIT_MCP_study (103 stars, last pushed 5d ago), with no licence file. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 941 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.