Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/cpp-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sifxprime/kodelyth-eccWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/cpp-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/cpp-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/cpp-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00898 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00449 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00180 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00090 |
Grade A, and why
cpp-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to cpp-review — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 133 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
C++ Code Review
This command invokes the cpp-reviewer agent for comprehensive C++-specific code review.
What This Command Does
- Identify C++ Changes: Find modified
.cpp,.hpp,.cc,.hfiles viagit diff - Run Static Analysis: Execute
clang-tidyandcppcheck - Memory Safety Scan: Check for raw new/delete, buffer overflows, use-after-free
- Concurrency Review: Analyze thread safety, mutex usage, data races
- Modern C++ Check: Verify code follows C++17/20 conventions and best practices
- Generate Report: Categorize issues by severity
When to Use
Use /cpp-review when:
- After writing or modifying C++ code
- Before committing C++ changes
- Reviewing pull requests with C++ code
- Onboarding to a new C++ codebase
- Checking for memory safety issues
Review Categories
CRITICAL (Must Fix)
- Raw
new/deletewithout RAII - Buffer overflows and use-after-free
- Data races without synchronization
- Command injection via
system() - Uninitialized variable reads
- Null pointer dereferences
HIGH (Should Fix)
- Rule of Five violations
- Missing
std::lock_guard/std::scoped_lock - Detached threads without proper lifetime management
- C-style casts instead of
static_cast/dynamic_cast - Missing
constcorrectness
MEDIUM (Consider)
- Unnecessary copies (pass by value instead of
const&) - Missing
reserve()on known-size containers using namespace std;in headers- Missing
[[nodiscard]]on important return values - Overly complex template metaprogramming
Automated Checks Run
# Static analysis
clang-tidy --checks='*,-llvmlibc-*' src/*.cpp -- -std=c++17
# Additional analysis
cppcheck --enable=all --suppress=missingIncludeSystem src/
# Build with warnings
cmake --build build -- -Wall -Wextra -Wpedantic
Example Usage
User: /cpp-review
Agent:
# C++ Code Review Report
## Files Reviewed
- src/handler/user.cpp (modified)
- src/service/auth.cpp (modified)
## Static Analysis Results
✓ clang-tidy: 2 warnings
✓ cppcheck: No issues
## Issues Found
[CRITICAL] Memory Leak
File: src/service/auth.cpp:45
Issue: Raw `new` without matching `delete`
```cpp
auto* session = new Session(userId); // Memory leak!
cache[userId] = session;
Fix: Use std::unique_ptr
auto session = std::make_unique<Session>(userId);
cache[userId] = std::move(session);
[HIGH] Missing const Reference File: src/handler/user.cpp:28 Issue: Large object passed by value
void processUser(User user) { // Unnecessary copy
Fix: Pass by const reference
void processUser(const User& user) {
Summary
- CRITICAL: 1
- HIGH: 1
- MEDIUM: 0
Recommendation: FAIL: Block merge until CRITICAL issue is fixed
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 133 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 58a0e058207b
cpp-review is a command published in the GitHub repository sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc (11 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 898 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to cpp-review, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
toh-help
Display all Toh Framework commands and quick usage guide.
opsx-new
Start a new change using the experimental artifact workflow (OPSX).
research
Delegate a thorough research investigation to the agy:runner subagent.
experiment
Design A/B test with statistical rigor. Usage: /mindforge:experiment [feature] [--metric conversion|engagement|revenue] [--duration 2w].
kimi-setup
Run node "$HOME/.kimi-plugin/kimi-companion.mjs" setup, then report installation and authentication status.
Obad
Search for given words or phrases in the book of Obadiah in one or multiple bibles.