Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Sivan757/dsh-agent-plugins-marketWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/sivan757/dsh-agent-plugins-market/modernize-map)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sivan757/dsh-agent-plugins-market/modernize-map"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sivan757/dsh-agent-plugins-market/modernize-map/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sivan757/dsh-agent-plugins-market/modernize-map"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sivan757/dsh-agent-plugins-market/modernize-map.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.02182 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00873 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00436 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00218 |
Grade A, and why
modernize-map scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to modernize-map — 259 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 185 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Build a dependency and topology map of legacy/$1 and render it visually.
The assessment gave us domains. Now go one level deeper: how do the pieces connect? This is the map an engineer needs before touching anything.
What to produce
Write a one-off analysis script (Python or shell — your choice) that parses
the source under legacy/$1 and extracts the four datasets below. Three
principles apply across stacks; getting them wrong produces a misleading map:
- Edges live in two places — direct calls in source, and dispatcher/ router calls whose targets are variables (config tables, route maps, dependency injection, dynamic dispatch). Resolve variables against config before declaring an edge unresolvable.
- The code↔storage join is usually external configuration, not source — job/deployment descriptors map logical names to physical stores.
- Entry points usually live in deployment config, not source — without parsing it, every top-level module looks unreachable.
Extract:
- Program/module call graph — direct calls (
CALL, method invocations,import/require) and dispatcher calls (EXEC CICS LINK/XCTL, DI container wiring, framework routing, reflection/factory). Resolve variable call targets against route tables, copybooks, config, or constant pools. - Data dependency graph — which modules read/write which data stores,
joined through the relevant config:
SELECT…ASSIGN TO↔ JCLDD(batch COBOL),EXEC CICS READ/WRITE…FILE()↔ CSDDEFINE FILE(CICS online),EXEC SQLtable refs (embedded SQL), ORM annotations/mappings (Java/.NET), model files (Node/Python/Ruby). Include UI/screen bindings (BMS maps, JSPs, templates) — they're dependencies too. - Entry points — whatever the stack's outermost invoker is, read from
where it's defined: JCL
EXEC PGM=and CICS CSDDEFINE TRANSACTION(mainframe),web.xml/route annotations/route files (web),main()/argv parsing (CLI), queue/scheduler subscriptions (event-driven). - Dead-end candidates — modules with no inbound edges. Only meaningful once all the entry-point and call-edge types above are in the graph. Suppress the dead claim for anything that could be the target of an unresolved dynamic call. A grep-only graph will mark most dispatcher-driven modules (CICS programs, Spring controllers, ORM-bound DAOs) dead when they aren't.
If the source is fixed-column (COBOL columns 8–72, RPG, etc.), slice the code area and strip comment lines before regex matching, or you'll match sequence numbers and commented-out code.
Save the script as analysis/$1/extract_topology.py (or .sh) so it can be
re-run and audited. Have it write a machine-readable
analysis/$1/topology.json and print a human summary. Run it; show the
summary (cap at ~200 lines for very large estates).
topology.json must follow this schema — it feeds the interactive viewer:
{
"system": "<display name>",
"root": {
"id": "sys", "name": "<system>", "kind": "system",
"children": [
{ "id": "dom:<domain>", "name": "<Domain>", "kind": "domain",
"children": [
{ "id": "<MODULE>", "name": "<MODULE>", "kind": "module",
"language": "cobol", "loc": 1234, "file": "src/MODULE.cbl" }
] },
{ "id": "dom:data", "name": "Data stores", "kind": "domain",
"children": [
{ "id": "ds:<NAME>", "name": "<NAME>", "kind": "datastore" }
] }
]
},
"edges": [
{ "source": "<id>", "target": "<id>", "kind": "call" }
],
"entryPoints": ["<id>", "..."],
"deadEnds": ["<id>", "..."],
"observations": ["<architect observation>", "..."],
"flows": [
{ "name": "<business flow>", "persona": "<who experiences it>",
"description": "<one sentence, plain language>",
"steps": [
{ "label": "<business-language step>", "nodes": ["<id>", "<id>"] }
] }
]
}
- Group leaf modules under
domaincontainers (use the domains from/modernize-assessif available). Leaf kinds:module,datastore,job,screen.locdrives circle size — include it for modules. - Edge kinds:
call(direct),dispatch(dynamic/router),read,write. Every edge endpoint must be a leaf id that exists in the tree. deadEnds: the dead-end candidates from the extraction, rendered with a dashed outline in the viewer. Apply the suppression rules above — anything that could be the target of an unresolved dynamic call does NOT belong here; record that uncertainty inobservationsinstead.- Datastore ids and names must be logical identifiers — DD name,
dataset name, table/schema name, at most host:port. If the resolved
config value is a URL or DSN, strip userinfo and credential query
params before it goes anywhere in topology.json: the file gets
committed and the viewer displays names verbatim. Never copy raw
config values into
observations. observations: 3–7 architect observations — tight coupling clusters, single points of failure, service-extraction candidates, data stores with too many writers, dispatch targets the extraction could not resolve.flowsis the persona walkthrough section — see below.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 185 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 880f06e11c4d
modernize-map is a command published in the GitHub repository Sivan757/dsh-agent-plugins-market (13 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 2,182 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to modernize-map, differing in 259 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.
speckit.bug.fix
Apply the remediation from a bug assessment and record what was changed.