gh-issue-use-aws

gh-issue-use-aws is a command for Claude Code from skyfox675/agents-skills. It costs 80 tokens per session (1,145 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A command that investigates a reported problem in the application's live AWS cloud environment, then files a detailed GitHub issue. AWS is Amazon's cloud platform, and the investigation uses read-only logs, metrics, settings, and event history.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to diagnose problems such as failed downloads, empty results, or stuck pipelines and create a ready-to-work GitHub issue with the cloud cause attached.
Why use it?
Some failures cannot be explained from source code alone because the cause is in the deployed cloud setup. The issue includes evidence so another developer does not need to repeat the investigation.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths; mentions subagents.

Good fit Use it to diagnose problems such as failed downloads, empty results, or stuck pipelines and create a ready-to-work GitHub issue with the cloud cause attached.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/skyfox675/agents-skills/gh-issue-use-aws
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/skyfox675/agents-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for gh-issue-use-aws

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/skyfox675/agents-skills/gh-issue-use-aws/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/skyfox675/agents-skills/gh-issue-use-aws)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/skyfox675/agents-skills/gh-issue-use-aws"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/skyfox675/agents-skills/gh-issue-use-aws/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for gh-issue-use-aws

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/skyfox675/agents-skills/gh-issue-use-aws"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/skyfox675/agents-skills/gh-issue-use-aws.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 80 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,145 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00080 $0.01145
Opus 5 $0.00040 $0.00573
Sonnet 5 $0.00016 $0.00229
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00114

Measured 9d ago against content hash b29d92a5e554, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

gh-issue-use-aws scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/gh-issue-use-aws.md · 35 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 35 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/gh-issue-use-aws — file a groomed GitHub issue with an AWS-traced diagnosis

Arguments: $ARGUMENTS — parsed exactly like /gh-issue (see gh-issue.md in this commands directory): breadcrumb first, optional model:/effort: tokens anywhere, the rest is the description. The filing flow — codebase recon, duplicate check, groomed anatomy, labels, report — is /gh-issue's, unchanged. This command adds one phase: an AWS deep-dive between recon and drafting, run against the operator's current AWS CLI session. (Tracking work in Jira instead? Use /jira-issue-use-aws.)

The AWS deep-dive

The point: many symptoms ("the tile shows zero", "downloads 403", "the pipeline never finishes") can't be root-caused from code alone — the answer lives in CloudWatch logs, resource configuration, IAM, or event history. An issue that ships with the cloud-traced root cause ("the Lambda's env var is missing on the deployed function — ARN ..., confirmed via get-function-configuration") is dispatchable without the implementer re-deriving the diagnosis with their own (possibly absent) AWS access.

Ground rules — read-only means read-only

  • Identity first. Run aws sts get-caller-identity and note account + assumed role; state the account/region every finding came from. If the session's account doesn't plausibly match the environment the operator described, say so and stop the deep-dive — evidence from the wrong account is worse than none.
  • Allowed operations: get-*, describe-*, list-*, lookup-events (CloudTrail), filter-log-events / tail (CloudWatch Logs), and the Logs Insights pair start-query/get-query-results (sanctioned despite the start- prefix — it reads, it doesn't change state; keep queries time-bounded, scanning costs money).
  • Forbidden, no exceptions: anything that creates, updates, deletes, puts, attaches, modifies, tags, invokes, starts (other than start-query), stops, reboots, or terminates. lambda invoke counts as forbidden — executing code is not reading state.
  • Secrets stay sealed. Diagnose with metadata (describe-secret, parameter descriptions, key existence) — never get-secret-value or get-parameter --with-decryption. If a diagnosis genuinely hinges on a secret's value, report that to the operator as an operator-action item instead of reading it.
  • Use the session as-is. No --profile switching unless the operator named one. The session's permissions are the boundary — an AccessDenied is a finding ("diagnosis needs X permission"), not an obstacle to work around.
  • Only sts get-caller-identity, log reads, and CloudTrail lookups are pre-approved above; other read calls will prompt per the project's permission settings. Adopting projects that use this command often should allowlist their common read patterns in .claude/settings.json rather than blanket-granting aws:* — the narrow grant is what keeps "read-only" enforceable.

Read the full file on GitHub · 35 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 35 lines · 80 tokens per session scan A b29d92a5e554

Subscribe to this mod's changes

gh-issue-use-aws is a command published in the GitHub repository skyfox675/agents-skills (10 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 80 tokens to every session and 1,145 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.