jira-issue-use-aws

jira-issue-use-aws is a command for Claude Code from skyfox675/agents-skills. It costs 79 tokens per session (1,171 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A Jira issue command that adds a read-only investigation of Amazon Web Services (AWS), a cloud platform, before filing the issue. It checks logs, measurements, deployed resources, permissions, and event history through the current AWS command-line session.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for bugs involving cloud-hosted features such as failed downloads, empty results, stuck pipelines, missing settings, or service errors.
Why use it?
Some problems cannot be explained from source code alone because the cause is in the deployed cloud system. The issue includes cloud evidence so another developer does not need to repeat that investigation.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths; mentions subagents.

Good fit Use it for bugs involving cloud-hosted features such as failed downloads, empty results, stuck pipelines, missing settings, or service errors.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/skyfox675/agents-skills/jira-issue-use-aws
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/skyfox675/agents-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for jira-issue-use-aws

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/skyfox675/agents-skills/jira-issue-use-aws/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/skyfox675/agents-skills/jira-issue-use-aws)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/skyfox675/agents-skills/jira-issue-use-aws"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/skyfox675/agents-skills/jira-issue-use-aws/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for jira-issue-use-aws

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/skyfox675/agents-skills/jira-issue-use-aws"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/skyfox675/agents-skills/jira-issue-use-aws.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 79 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,171 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00079 $0.01171
Opus 5 $0.00039 $0.00585
Sonnet 5 $0.00016 $0.00234
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00117

Measured 12d ago against content hash 96358bdec57a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

jira-issue-use-aws scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/jira-issue-use-aws.md · 35 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 35 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/jira-issue-use-aws — file a groomed Jira issue with an AWS-traced diagnosis

Arguments: $ARGUMENTS — parsed exactly like /jira-issue (see jira-issue.md in this commands directory): breadcrumb first, optional model:/effort: tokens anywhere, the rest is the description. The filing flow — codebase recon, duplicate check (JQL), groomed anatomy, fields, report — is /jira-issue's, unchanged. This command adds one phase: an AWS deep-dive between recon and drafting, run against the operator's current AWS CLI session. (Tracking work in GitHub instead? Use /gh-issue-use-aws.)

The AWS deep-dive

The point: many symptoms ("the tile shows zero", "downloads 403", "the pipeline never finishes") can't be root-caused from code alone — the answer lives in CloudWatch logs, resource configuration, IAM, or event history. An issue that ships with the cloud-traced root cause ("the Lambda's env var is missing on the deployed function — ARN ..., confirmed via get-function-configuration") is dispatchable without the implementer re-deriving the diagnosis with their own (possibly absent) AWS access.

Ground rules — read-only means read-only

  • Identity first. Run aws sts get-caller-identity and note account + assumed role; state the account/region every finding came from. If the session's account doesn't plausibly match the environment the operator described, say so and stop the deep-dive — evidence from the wrong account is worse than none.
  • Allowed operations: get-*, describe-*, list-*, lookup-events (CloudTrail), filter-log-events / tail (CloudWatch Logs), and the Logs Insights pair start-query/get-query-results (sanctioned despite the start- prefix — it reads, it doesn't change state; keep queries time-bounded, scanning costs money).
  • Forbidden, no exceptions: anything that creates, updates, deletes, puts, attaches, modifies, tags, invokes, starts (other than start-query), stops, reboots, or terminates. lambda invoke counts as forbidden — executing code is not reading state.
  • Secrets stay sealed. Diagnose with metadata (describe-secret, parameter descriptions, key existence) — never get-secret-value or get-parameter --with-decryption. If a diagnosis genuinely hinges on a secret's value, report that to the operator as an operator-action item instead of reading it.
  • Use the session as-is. No --profile switching unless the operator named one. The session's permissions are the boundary — an AccessDenied is a finding ("diagnosis needs X permission"), not an obstacle to work around.
  • Only sts get-caller-identity, log reads, and CloudTrail lookups are pre-approved above; other read calls will prompt per the project's permission settings. Adopting projects that use this command often should allowlist their common read patterns in .claude/settings.json rather than blanket-granting aws:* — the narrow grant is what keeps "read-only" enforceable.

Read the full file on GitHub · 35 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 35 lines · 79 tokens per session scan A 96358bdec57a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

jira-issue-use-aws is a command published in the GitHub repository skyfox675/agents-skills (11 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 79 tokens to every session and 1,171 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.