Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/snakeying/TextumWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/snakeying/textum/prd-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/snakeying/textum/prd-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/snakeying/textum/prd-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/snakeying/textum/prd-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/snakeying/textum/prd-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01114 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00446 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00223 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00111 |
Grade A, and why
prd-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
阶段1a: 需求澄清(写入 YAML plan-pack)
读取:docs/prd-plan-pack.yaml(如存在) | 写入:docs/prd-plan-pack.yaml(每轮更新;纯 YAML;不包含 ```) | 模板:.claude/textum/prd-plan-pack-template.yaml
目标:把已确认事实持续写入 docs/prd-plan-pack.yaml(唯一事实来源),直到满足 READY 门禁。
输出规则(必须遵守)
输出必须二选一(除此之外不要输出任何解释/复述):
IN_PROGRESS:- 只输出两块内容:
- 本轮问题(≤4;只问 blockers)或 本轮变更摘要(YAML 路径列表)
- 剩余 blockers(≤8;按优先级)
- 只输出两块内容:
READY:- 只输出三行纯文本:
READY已写入:docs/prd-plan-pack.yaml下一步:/prd
- 只输出三行纯文本:
- 不输出 YAML 正文(包括
docs/prd-plan-pack.yaml与PRD_PLAN_CLARIFY_PACK)
写入规则(必须遵守)
- 未确认信息不得写入;未知保持为空/空数组
- 仅当用户明确说“无/不适用/没有”时才写
N/A或None - 不改写用户给出的 token(尤其
modules[].feature_points[].landing)
PRD_PLAN_CLARIFY_PACK 处理(必须)
当用户粘贴 PRD_PLAN_CLARIFY_PACK 时:
- 只围绕
blockers提问(≤4) - 收集答案后,按
blockers[].path回填到docs/prd-plan-pack.yaml(保留其它已确认字段) - 输出「本轮变更摘要(路径列表)」+「剩余 blockers」
READY 门禁(必填路径清单)
project.name、project.one_liner非空goals[0+]、non_goals[0+]:每条非空scope.in[0+]、scope.out[0+]:每条非空roles[0+]:每个 role 的role/description非空;typical_scenarios[0+]且每条非空permission_matrix.operations[0+]:每行op非空;per_role至少 1 个 key(key 必须是roles[].role子集;value 只能是A/D/O);note可为N/Amodules[0+]:每个模块id/name/summary/priority非空;且至少 1 个模块priority = P0modules[].feature_points[0+]:每条fp/desc/landing非空(landing允许N/A)modules[].scenarios[0+]:每条actor/given/when/then非空(fail_or_edge/note可为N/A)business_rules[0+]:每条id/desc/scope非空(exception_or_note可为N/A)- 稳定 ID:
modules[].id必须唯一且符合M-01格式modules[].feature_points[].fp必须全局唯一且符合FP-001格式business_rules[].id必须唯一且符合BR-001格式
api.has_api必须为布尔值:false:api.endpoints=[];api.base_url/auth/...可为N/Atrue:api.base_url非空且不为N/A;api.auth非空且不为N/A(无认证写None);api.endpoints[0+]且每条method/path/permission/summary非空
modules[].feature_points[].landing合法性(不改写 token):- 允许:
N/A或逗号分隔多项集合 - 每项必须以
DB:/FILE:/CFG:/EXT:之一开头 - 若出现
DB:<table>:该<table>必须能在data_model.tables[].table中找到
- 允许:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 69 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A bbb26774f420
prd-plan is a command published in the GitHub repository snakeying/Textum (41 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,114 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
statuswt
You are checking the status of all active worktree task files in the project.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.