Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sodam-ai/SoDam-Reverse-EngWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/sodam-ai/sodam-reverse-eng/re-agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sodam-ai/sodam-reverse-eng/re-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sodam-ai/sodam-reverse-eng/re-agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sodam-ai/sodam-reverse-eng/re-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sodam-ai/sodam-reverse-eng/re-agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.00525 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00262 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00105 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
re-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/re-agent — AI 코딩 에이전트 구조 분석
분석 대상 (내 설정 폴더 또는 지정 repo): $ARGUMENTS
re-analyze-agent 스킬의 순서를 그대로 따르세요:
- 안전 스코프(1층) — 크랙·우회·추출·프롬프트 탈취 요청이면 보고서 대신 즉시 거부 + 방어적 대안 제안.
- 동의 게이트 — 내 설정이면 2문항(① 본인 소유/허가? ② 책임은 사용자?), 남의 repo면 3문항 강화(+방어·교육 목적?). 하나라도 '아니오'/무응답 → 중단.
- 읽기 전용 분석 — 대상을 실행하지 않고 소스만 읽음(외부 도구 없음).
..·심볼릭·동의범위밖 경로 거부, 발견한 키/토큰은••••마스킹. - 표준 한국어 보고서 — 한 줄 요약·에이전트 개요·구성요소 목록·권한/도구 범위·트리거/흐름·쉬운 설명(교육)·근거 위치·불확실한 점·다음 확인사항·⚠️ 안전.
- 저장 —
./.sodam-re/agent/로컬 전용.
안전 경계
| 요청 | 결과 |
|---|---|
| "내 claude 플러그인·스킬 구조 이해하고 싶어" | ✅ 동의 후 진행 |
| "이 에이전트가 어떤 권한·도구를 쓰는지 알려줘" | ✅ 동의 후 진행 |
| 크랙·우회·키/시크릿 추출 방법 | 🛑 1층 거부 |
| 남의 에이전트 시스템 프롬프트 탈취·jailbreak 우회 | 🛑 1층 거부 |
| 타사 repo 무단 분석 | 🛑 동의 게이트 차단 |
소스레벨(외부 도구 없음)이라 안드로이드/바이너리와 달리 라이브 검증이 AI만으로 가능합니다.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 28 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 6bc4ef83fbb5
re-agent is a command published in the GitHub repository sodam-ai/SoDam-Reverse-Eng (4 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 525 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
skill-maker
A guided prompt for designing a new SKILL.md file, which is a reusable instruction set for an AI agent. It turns a user’s idea into the required skill format and includes safety and formatting rules.
long-text-summary
A command that summarizes pasted Korean or other long text into its main points in up to three short lines.
presentation-script
A command that writes a presentation script from a topic and speaking time. It structures the script into an introduction, main section, and conclusion, with spoken wording and stage cues.
explain-simply
A command that explains a difficult concept in simple Korean using one everyday comparison, based on the listener's age or level.
natural-english
A Korean-to-English writing helper that turns Korean sentences into natural English and briefly explains the wording.
self-intro-polish
A guided writing prompt for turning personal notes into a short self-introduction. It adapts the tone to the intended use, such as a formal application or a friendly social post.