Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sodam-ai/SoDam-Reverse-EngWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/sodam-ai/sodam-reverse-eng/re-android)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sodam-ai/sodam-reverse-eng/re-android"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sodam-ai/sodam-reverse-eng/re-android/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sodam-ai/sodam-reverse-eng/re-android"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sodam-ai/sodam-reverse-eng/re-android.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00499 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00249 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00100 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00050 |
Grade A, and why
re-android scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/re-android — 안드로이드 APK 분석
분석 대상 APK: $ARGUMENTS
re-analyze-android 스킬의 순서를 그대로 따르세요:
- 안전 스코프(1층) — 크랙·우회·추출 요청이면 보고서 대신 즉시 거부 + 방어적 대안 제안.
- 동의 게이트(강화) — ① 본인 소유/허가 APK? ② 방어·교육 목적? ③ 책임은 사용자? 하나라도 '아니오'/무응답 → 중단.
- 도구 확인 — JADX·Apktool·Java 17+ 설치 확인. 없으면 설치 안내만 하고 분석 시작 안 함(fail-closed).
- 디컴파일 — 읽기 전용, 인자 배열(주입 방지), 대상 실행 금지.
- 표준 한국어 보고서 — 한 줄 요약·앱 개요·퍼미션·API/URL·근거 위치·불확실한 점·다음 확인사항·⚠️ 안전.
- 저장 —
./.sodam-re/android/로컬 전용.
안전 경계
| 요청 | 결과 |
|---|---|
| "내가 만든 APK 구조 이해하고 싶어" | ✅ 동의 후 진행 |
| "이 앱의 퍼미션·API 알려줘" | ✅ 동의 후 진행 |
| 크랙·우회·키 추출 방법 | 🛑 1층 거부 |
| 타사 APK 무단 분석 | 🛑 동의 게이트 차단 |
✅ 실제 디컴파일 전 과정이 2026-07-13 라이브 검증으로 확인되었습니다(JADX 1.5.6·Apktool 3.0.2·Java 17 환경, 공개 오픈소스 앱 실제 분석·보고서 저장까지 성공 —
D:\Test_Dev\test6\.sodam-re\android\실제 보고서 파일로 재확인, 2026-07-27). 이후 변경된 부분의 재확인은 사용자가 진행 중입니다.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 28 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A d57ac8cda640
re-android is a command published in the GitHub repository sodam-ai/SoDam-Reverse-Eng (4 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 499 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
skill-maker
A guided prompt for designing a new SKILL.md file, which is a reusable instruction set for an AI agent. It turns a user’s idea into the required skill format and includes safety and formatting rules.
presentation-script
A command that writes a presentation script from a topic and speaking time. It structures the script into an introduction, main section, and conclusion, with spoken wording and stage cues.
explain-simply
A command that explains a difficult concept in simple Korean using one everyday comparison, based on the listener's age or level.
long-text-summary
A command that summarizes pasted Korean or other long text into its main points in up to three short lines.
natural-english
A Korean-to-English writing helper that turns Korean sentences into natural English and briefly explains the wording.
self-intro-polish
A guided writing prompt for turning personal notes into a short self-introduction. It adapts the tone to the intended use, such as a formal application or a friendly social post.