Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/solanabr/auditor-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/solanabr/auditor-skill/economic-sim)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/solanabr/auditor-skill/economic-sim"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/solanabr/auditor-skill/economic-sim.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.00212 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00106 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00042 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00021 |
Grade A, and why
auditor:economic-sim scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
auditor-skill — Economic Simulation
Arguments: $ARGUMENTS
- Model the attack: capital / setup cost, extractable value, atomicity (single-tx / multi-slot), flash-loanable ceilings per venue.
- Compute whether profit > cost at any manipulation level (e.g. cost to move spot price 1 / 5 / 10 %).
- If a Surfpool mainnet-fork is available, reproduce the sequence against forked pool state and record the net P/L.
- Produce the quantified PoC that Rule 5b requires for High / Critical economic findings — dollar figures, not yes/no.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 16 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A 00e6bfa440c7
auditor:economic-sim is a command published in the GitHub repository solanabr/auditor-skill (53 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 212 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
burn-rate
Compute the recent 7-day spend trend (burn rate) from daily sessions and per-session cost.
unit-economics
Unit economics analysis — CAC/LTV estimation, churn inference, gross margin per unit.
competitive
Competitive landscape analysis — peer positioning, market-share dynamics, moat assessment.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.