Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/solanabr/auditor-skill/intakegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/solanabr/auditor-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/solanabr/auditor-skill/intake)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/solanabr/auditor-skill/intake"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/solanabr/auditor-skill/intake.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00100 | $0.01067 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00050 | $0.00534 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00213 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00107 |
Grade A, and why
auditor:intake scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 43 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
auditor-skill — Engagement Intake / Scope
Arguments: $ARGUMENTS
Turn the passive QUESTIONS.md questionnaire into a persisted audit_<n>/intake.md. Read QUESTIONS.md first (the source questions + the "How Answers Affect the Audit" table) and templates/intake.md (the artifact you fill). This fixes the gap where intake answers lived only in conversation state — both /auditor:audit-cycle and /auditor:audit-assist read the file you write here.
Mode
- Interactive (default) — walk the human through the questions. Ask sharp, answerable questions; do not dump all 45 at once. Group by section, skip questions the repo already answers (detected language, framework), confirm rather than re-ask.
--auto— no human present (theaudit-cyclepath). Apply theQUESTIONS.mddefault for every unanswered question and record each under Assumed Defaults (Unanswered) with the exact default applied. Never leave a field blank; never assume silently.
Steps
-
Discover. Enumerate the repo (extensions,
Anchor.toml/Cargo.toml/package.json/.github/). Pre-fill languages, framework, monorepo shape, and DEX/oracle/CPI hints from what the code shows — do not ask what the code already answers. -
Pin the commit.
git rev-parse HEAD. Record the full 40-char SHA and branch so the report names exactly what was reviewed. -
Warm from prior audits (if available). If
tools/auditor-toolsis built,audit-mem warm <program-id>injects the prior protocol profile and open false-positive rulings — pre-fill from it and confirm rather than re-ask. If absent, skip. -
Walk QUESTIONS.md → intake.md. Fill every section of
templates/intake.md:- Scope & commit pin — in/out of scope (honor
Q44excludes),--scopeboundary. - Languages & frameworks (
Q3–Q7) — drives the scope-gated checklist set (SKILL.md→ SCOPE-GATED LOADING). - Protocol class (
Q1,Q17–Q24) — gates checklist 06 + economic known-vectors when funds are handled. - Compliance (
Q35–Q38) — gates checklist 18. - Severity calibration (
Q8,Q10,Q11,Q40–Q41) — record the concrete lever applied (mainnet → +1 on fund findings; TVL > $1M → double-weight criticals; single-wallet upgrade authority → auto Severity 8+), per the QUESTIONS.md effects table. Feeds report §5. - Trust-model inputs (critical) (
Q11,Q14–Q16,Q23) — for each of admin / upgrade authority / oracle / keeper / LP / permissionless user, record who holds it, what they can do, and what the review trusts them NOT to do. "Untrusted / permissionless" is a valid, important answer. This seeds report §4.4 and §4.6, and is the actor list/auditor:threat-modelexpands. - Security history (
Q25–Q28).
- Scope & commit pin — in/out of scope (honor
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 43 lines · 100 tokens per session scan A f72934e9622a
auditor:intake is a command published in the GitHub repository solanabr/auditor-skill (52 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 100 tokens to every session and 1,067 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
deploy
Deploy Solana program (devnet first, then mainnet).
cleanup
Initialize forked template — setup CLAUDE.md and remove config repo scaffolding.
setup-ci-cd
Setup CI/CD pipeline with automated security checks for Solana programs.
audit-solana
Security audit for Solana programs (Anchor/native).
diff-review
AI-powered diff review for Solana-specific issues and code quality.
generate-idl-client
Generate TypeScript client from Solana program IDL using Codama or Anchor.