Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/solanabr/auditor-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/solanabr/auditor-skill/spec-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/solanabr/auditor-skill/spec-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/solanabr/auditor-skill/spec-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/solanabr/auditor-skill/spec-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/solanabr/auditor-skill/spec-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00237 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00095 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00047 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
auditor:spec-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
auditor-skill — Spec Compliance (Mode 5)
Arguments: $ARGUMENTS
- Extract a requirement list (Spec-IR) from the supplied spec.
- Run Phase 0 setup + Phase 0.5 Context Reconstruction; map each instruction / state field to the spec's stated behavior.
- Build a Compliance Matrix: each requirement →
[MET]/[VIOLATED-N]/[UNIMPLEMENTED]/[UNDOCUMENTED-BEHAVIOR], cited to codeL#. - Any
[VIOLATED-N]with N≥6 must pass the Rule 5b gate.[UNDOCUMENTED-BEHAVIOR](code does something the spec never authorizes) is itself a finding. - Report the Compliance Matrix + findings.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 17 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A f7c5a7331203
auditor:spec-audit is a command published in the GitHub repository solanabr/auditor-skill (61 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 237 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
genshijin-review
A compact Japanese-language code-review command that reports one finding per line with a severity label and suggested fix.
review
Recent git commits: !git log --oneline -10.
review-open-prs
Command "review-open-prs" from The-Artificer-of-Ciphers-LLC/skills-from-the-artificer, covering batch pr review directive — all open prs i did not author, phase a — enumerate target prs & build the queue, phase b — per-pr directive (runs once per queued $pr), 0. context anchoring and 1. preconditions.
snr-build
Architect and scaffold a new project to senior professional standards, in the order that avoids expensive retrofits.
resolve-review
Resolve reviewer feedback - from GitHub PRs, chat, or any reviewer.
setup
Set up, configure, or reconfigure notabene and start the docs review server.